Why is Chicago the center of the NWO?

Below is an article from my archives. This goes along with my other post "Great Britain owns USA."

Begin post:

+++++++++++++++++++++++

The Southwest Reporter

Special Edition Sept. 30, 1995

Why Chicago as the Center for Metro and the

New World Order Treasonists?

By David A. Newby & "Grandma"

As this mystery unravels we have found more that has been hidden from us. A very dear friend and fellow researcher asked a relevant question in reference to this Metro mess, "Why Chicago"? This is a very pertinent question and what the attendant research revealed will be just one more shock upon those already revealed.

Grandma and I have to do our work by phone and fax. We don't have the luxury of having the same books to work from in most cases and this slows down this process of divination of the mystery. She has copies of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found that under the original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the Virginia and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter.

Quoting the 11th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911:
"In the year 1670 Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert and seventeen other noblemen and gentlemen, incorporation them as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of England trading into Hudson's Bay,' securing to them the 'sole trade and commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks and streams in whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within the entrance of the straits commonly called Hudson's Straits, together with all lands and territories upon the countries, coasts and islands of the seas, bays, & aforesaid, that are not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our subjects, or possessed by the subjects of any other Christian prince or state."

With this broad grant of latitude of all the waterways it should be pretty obvious that the Charter included all of the Great Lakes. But aside from all of this granting of land by the King, the Charter was also granted the whole right to travel for trade to and from the bays and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the Charter has heavy relevance later in this article.

In 1842 a Convention was concluded with England establishing the northern border of the United States at the 49th parallel. In studying these treaties and the laws you must always look at the words because they always have a relevance. Citing the Convention as to boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of 1842 Article IV states:
"All grants of land heretofore made by either party, within the limits of the territory which by this treaty falls within the dominions of the other party, shall by held valid, ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant..."

This section states that any property rights would be honored. In 1863 there was a "Treaty for Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay Company, etc." Article I states in part:
"...it was stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation of the territory south of the 49th parallel of the north latitude, as provided in the first article of the said treaty, (1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should by respected."

The verbiage is identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of the rockies and similar to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all of this in these two treaties is that Chicago was a fort or outpost of the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and most definitely by 1863 Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption that the Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties are there.

Remember that the original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company control over all trade and travel to and from the "waters". Chicago today is a free port under maritime. With control of the travel and trade granted in the original charter, it most probably means that the Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the railroads, ports and roads in Chicago and probably does so to this day. The Hudson's Bay Company was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that Chicago, at least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American soil and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown! That's "Why Chicago"!

When one is into researching this type of data you never know what you may find. While digging through the books I found the Proclamation of 1763 in the Documents of American History. Within this Proclamation we see the King of England establishing four new governments, one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in West Florida and one in Grenada.

All of this got us to thinking. Why is the King of England setting up government in these obviously French and Spanish territories? We discovered that France and Spain had fought a war against England and concluded it with a treaty in Paris in February of 1763. The Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year. We determined that these aforementioned territories falling under British control shows that they were "prizes of war" and taken under treaty. The relevance of all of this comes to light when you look at the fact that we supposedly bought the "Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How could we buy the Floridas from Spain if Spain gave them to England as war prizes?

The question led us to the Treaty of Friendship of 1795. Within the treaties of Spain at that time the King of Spain was always referred to as His Catholic Majesty. But within the document of 1795 we find a reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference and not an oversight. Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states:
"And if on any account it should be found necessary that the said Commissioners and Surveyors should be accompanied by guards, they shall be furnished in equal proportions by the commanding officer of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..."

As it appears from the distinction between His Catholic Majesty and His Majesty, there were British occupying forces in the Floridas. Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario: The King of England took over the territories of the Floridas. The King of Spain had subjects in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere. the King of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights to the cities, i.e. the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the United States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas it only bought the Spanish cities.

When you read the treaty of 1819 where the deal was made "His Majesty" appears again. From the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had to petition "His Majesty's foreign minister" to get permission to make the sale. The British control of the Floridas also helps explain why Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans" during the war of 1812... the British had a vested land interest!

Grandma states that the British troops were probably expelled, if they were not already gone, by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though there was no physical occupation by the British, the Crown still maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This could explain why Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program started. It also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil War, they were part owners!

Another point that must be considered is that as well educated as the generation of the Founders was, they must have known of the British ownership of the Floridas. Something of that magnitude could not be reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that there may possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States government and the Crown.
Not of us was ever taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this all into question. I am of the firm conviction nowadays that anything that is hidden in hidden for a reason.

We've proven, through treaties and charters that the Hudson's Bay Company owned Chicago and the travel and tread thereto which includes more than likely the Chicago Transit Authority, the Port Authority, the municipal water works, power and telecommunications companies, and the railroads.

Notice on the list of CSG Associates how many public utilities and public transpiration companies are affiliated. The following will establish the ADL aspect or the Khazarian connection. Citing from EIR's book, Dope, Inc.:
"The probe turned up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with Jewish gangsters, from Meyer Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary Dope, Inc. figures such as Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam Riklis, and the ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for the Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also discovered that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from leading families of Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes trace back to the British banks and trading companies that ran the opium clipper ships in and out of China in the last century."

Take note of the name Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia during the Kennedy administration. Lansky had definitive connections in Miami which still serves as a major point of ingress to this country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General Janet Reno comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up all manner of corruption in the book Votescam and by other individuals who worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she was picked as USAG specifically because of her probably ties directly into Metro.

The Khazarian Bronfman family owns the Seagrams empire which you will note is a corporate associate of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking interests include J.P. Morgan & Associates. Per the citing from Dope, Inc. these selfsame organizations serve as contributors to the ADL.

The Great Chicago fire occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of Claims with the Hudson's Bay Company back to the Crown. One of the prime methods of deleting land titles and records is by fire. You will find great numbers of burned houses of records in Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South during the Civil War in order to expunge deeds as well as the original 13th Amendment.

Franklin Roosevelt once said that in politics there are no coincidences. It is too coincidental that two years after the Crown took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay Company the city of Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it would be to destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in America. Grolier's National Encyclopedia states:
"The Great Fire destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000, which did not destroy the hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in two years..."

That means about $1 million per acre! We've done some figuring on just where that $178 million came from and this is what we came up with. Of Course, this is speculation based on certain real factors. In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we discussed the Gold Railroad bonds issued during the Grant administration that made certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted. These bonds totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance policy (Tontine) on someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied by about 1,500 deaths and that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on property loss runs about $100 million what with residential and commercial property, railroads, grainaries and cattle yards. That leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that the banks that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks which made up the other $11 million which caused reverberations throughout the nation causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of this:

Railroad bonds........................ $62 million

Property loss and death insurance.....$100 million

Bank loans called in...................$11 million

------------------

Total............$173 million

Which would leave $5 million to be balanced between the property damage, loss of life and the bank note calls equaling the $178 million required to rebuild. It is our contention that most of this money came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds in order to build a new "capitol" city in America from which to launch the New World Order through the Agent called Metro.

"In 1890, Lake Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received Chicago's sewage...the Chicago River, when the canal was brought in, reversed its course to flow into the Mississippi..."

- (Groliers - 1939)

With the Settlement of the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863 giving the lawful possessors of land control of the lands adjoining the water; with the burning of all titles and deeds to prove ownership being burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what a wonderful opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the Hudson's Bay Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the claims probably lost in court as they could not produce their deeds or titles due to the fire. do you see how neat it is? And on top of that it is a possibility that the assets of the major people involved had been spirited away and stored before "Mrs. O'leary's cow" started the fire. Could the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance scam and power play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself? The record of provable deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so we don't think this is beyond the realm of possibility. Especially when they modus operandi is the same, only on a larger scale.

Throughout this series we have laid out substantial proof of our assertions, which, upon investigation will prove out the charges levied of sedition, fraud, theft and treason. The United States government, in concert with the British/Zionist/Communist controlled Metro organizations and it's Governors' Conference of the fifty State Governors has worked continuously to destroy this nation.

Even if we are incorrect in our assessment and potential reasons for the Great Fire of 1871, (and we don't think we are), there is still more than enough evidence to convict these traitors in any court of true justice.

In 1908 the Council of Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress in reference to Conservation. This 1908 Declaration reads very similar to the RAMSAR, and Bio-diversity treaty currently put forth through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately tied into Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress. The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors Declaration on Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE CONTROL" of the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as well as for soil and forest conservation. Sounds just like the enviromentalist's "green" agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that that is exactly what it is.

It appears that anywhere between 20-40 years before these treaties, declarations and laws are to take effect, by the 99 years rule under the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create groups to push for the acceptance of the already decided change. That figures out to be 1-2 generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance. Look at how hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance through the cartoons your children watch and the commercials being aired on recycling. We are all being herded like cattle into the new Metro-ized society of the New World Order of British-Israel.

We all know that the flooding of the Midwest in the last two to three yours is unnatural. Is it possible that these floods are not accidental? With the rerouting and reversing of the Chicago River and it dumping into the Mississippi the backwash would not be evident at the headwaters but would flood downstream. does the connection to the Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a broadened area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who profits?

These articles are supposed to make you think and maybe do something to save your country and yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all for you. You have to help expose the lie, and many of you are.

In the last article we showed how the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913, but forgot to mention that two other British controlled organizations came into this country as well, the American Bar Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through the research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others it has been revealed that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British Intelligence arm MI-6 and is a spying and propaganda organization here to do nothing but to promote the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism.

The Intimate ties are there between the Khazarian elite and the royal heads of Europe and have been intertwined for centuries. This nation has stood as a bar to worldwide feudalism for the last two centuries, but the efforts by these same entities to destroy this nation and her people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of attention, de-education and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some blame lies with Metro et al., the rest lies with us.

Sources: Documents of American History - Commager U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements. Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911 Dope, Inc. EIR Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed.

Great Britain owns USA

From my archives. This one should stir up some debate. Hopefully it will get a lot of attention! I did not write this, I am just passing this along.
For a long time, I felt that our "presidential" elections were to elect the president of the Corporation, NOT the 50 states United. I guess I was correct, and to be correct, do you want Obama or McCain as President and CEO of the United States Incorporated, a Delaware corporation.

Begin Post here:::::

Great Britain owns USA
By: Stephen Kimbol Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'

What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15). Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace (1738) * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money that is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible that the King funded both sides of the War? But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States came to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so-called founding
fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was titled - An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up.

The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we've got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto (by the fact itself) a citizen of the United States.

A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person (artificial- person). "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272" Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no States, just Corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a Corporation. A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.
Article Six Section One keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts
contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two that states “Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States”. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.

The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank (just like the Federal Reserve Bank) of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States, which included the King, wanted to be paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the Militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes from the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the “floundering” fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.

America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!! If you don't believe it read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states, "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) that states that it is the Militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16). It states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States. The Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is there to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.

If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity,
Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794, which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.

Here is the key to were this started: Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactments and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."

We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish Shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that Great Britain owns the Jews and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is where all of our problems originate. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist.

Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520.

You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.

Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of an infant is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the State." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under
government." Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481

Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File that is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series that shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.

The form that is supposed to be used for this is Form 8288, IRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 Form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred
Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.?

Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so-called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to its udders? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all, breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor? You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don't want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be- slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist,
because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them. I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down. You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.

Now to Rome. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3)Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?

The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.

I could go on and on, his is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let this information scare you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations that are nothing but fictional entities that have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your slavery was because you believed a lie.