Friday, December 5, 2008
One day soon the straw that breaks the camels back is slowly wafting down and almost ready to land.
Hopefully, after the ashes cools down and the dust settles, true Americans, those who actually believe in the Bill of Rights can rebuild, with things fresh in their memories of how it became so corrupt with criminals running our government.
A fox with fleas, it is said, will pick up a stick and slowly submerge itself in water. The fleas jump higher and higher until the fox is all but under water, with only the stick still dry. The fleas, in order not to drown will jump on the stick and then the fox releases the stick with all the fleas on it.
This is what real Americans need to do, send this criminal government down river.
The days of optimism are getting shorter and shorter. The natives are getting restless, there is talk of tar and feathers, there is talk of lynch mobs, there is talk of even armed revolution! Will it happen? Who knows. With 95 million gun owners in the US who own 200 million weapons, that is a formidable army of patriots sick and tired of criminal governments stealing their money, stealing their freedoms and sovereignty.
Even at just 10 percent, that leaves 9.5 million who would rather die than give up their guns or their country. As time progresses, I will assume that more and more of the other 85.5 million will join the ranks. Those freedom fighters known as insurgent terrorists in the middle east would love to have 9.5 million members! I doubt that the government is the only one putting their ducks in a row. As the news reports, the most profitable and busiest business today in America is gun sales, and ammunition, and food supplies.
Those with forethought can make it through the fires. They will have guns, ammo, food and water and will put up a pretty good fight against roving gangs of looters looking for food.
This all sounds pretty gloomy, but what could trigger it? Plenty. A natural or man made disaster on a large scale.
Anything that could trigger riots, like the crash of the monetary system, the assassination of Obama, The end of Social Security funding, the end of welfare funding. All of that could trigger martial law and civil war in America.
It is designed to fail on purpose. It is designed to merge the US, Canada and Mexico into one entity. There are those will probably not allow this to happen.
Last time, during the "revolution", the people were pretty much matched up with the military arms wise. Today it is different. The people do not have Warthogs, F-16's or Humvies with 3 inch thick glass. The people probably do not have to many 50 cal machine guns, but I assume there are a few out there. However, I recall a poacher hunting with bow and arrow on Weyerhauser lands and he brought down their chopper with an arrow striking the tail rotor. Most likely a lucky shot.
Prepare for the worse and hope for the best is my motto. I can pretty much assure everyone that 2009 will be the year the shit hits the fan in one form or another. You can stock up lots of food, and as some do, they don't use their "store cards", to prevent tracking. The more who knows about your food, the more mouths you will be feeding, and deplete your stores in no time at all.
Tell a neighbor and he or she will come over when they are starving, and then the sister or brother, and their best friend.. etc.. see what I mean?
I also think ammo will skyrocket very soon. If you don't have a lot stored up for emergencies to protect your home, it would be prudent to think about getting more, sooner than later.
Of course, this is all just my opinion and not based on anything but my own thoughts.
Friday, November 7, 2008
If you knew a woman who was pregnant, who had 8 kids already, three who were deaf, two who were blind, one mentally retarded, and she had syphilis, would you recommend that she have an abortion?
Simple question, read it again and understand it, then decide.. Yes or no.
Read the next question before looking at the response for this one.
It is time to elect a new world leader, and only your vote counts. Here are the facts about the three candidates.
You must vote for one of them, A, B or C. based only on the information you have below, then cast your vote.
Associates with crooked politicians, and consults with astrologist. He's had two mistresses. He also chain smokes and drinks 8 to 10 martinis a day.
He was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until
noon, used opium in college and drinks a quart of
whiskey every evening.
He is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, doesn't smoke, drinks an occasional beer and never cheated on his wife.
Which of these candidates would be our choice? Decide first... no peeking, then scroll down for the response.
Candidate A is Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Candidate B is Winston Churchill.
Candidate C is Adolph Hitler.
And, by the way, on your answer to the abortion question: If you said YES, you just killed Beethoven.
Pretty interesting isn't it? Makes a person think before judging someone.
Wait till you see the end of this note! Keep reading..
Never be afraid to try something new.
Remember: Amateurs...built the ark.
Professionals...built the Titanic
And Finally, can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:
* 29 have been accused of spousal abuse
* 7 have been arrested for fraud
* 19 have been accused of writing bad checks
* 117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
* 3 have done time for assault
* 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
* 14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
* 8 have been arrested for shoplifting
* 21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
* 84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year...
Can you guess which organization this is?
Give up yet?
It's the 535 members of the United States Congress. The same group that crank out hundreds of new laws each year
designed to keep the rest of us in line.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Below is an article from my archives. This goes along with my other post "Great Britain owns USA."
The Southwest Reporter
Special Edition Sept. 30, 1995
Why Chicago as the Center for Metro and the
New World Order Treasonists?
By David A. Newby & "Grandma"
As this mystery unravels we have found more that has been hidden from us. A very dear friend and fellow researcher asked a relevant question in reference to this Metro mess, "Why Chicago"? This is a very pertinent question and what the attendant research revealed will be just one more shock upon those already revealed.
Grandma and I have to do our work by phone and fax. We don't have the luxury of having the same books to work from in most cases and this slows down this process of divination of the mystery. She has copies of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found that under the original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the Virginia and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter.
Quoting the 11th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911:
"In the year 1670 Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert and seventeen other noblemen and gentlemen, incorporation them as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of England trading into Hudson's Bay,' securing to them the 'sole trade and commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks and streams in whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within the entrance of the straits commonly called Hudson's Straits, together with all lands and territories upon the countries, coasts and islands of the seas, bays, & aforesaid, that are not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our subjects, or possessed by the subjects of any other Christian prince or state."
With this broad grant of latitude of all the waterways it should be pretty obvious that the Charter included all of the Great Lakes. But aside from all of this granting of land by the King, the Charter was also granted the whole right to travel for trade to and from the bays and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the Charter has heavy relevance later in this article.
In 1842 a Convention was concluded with England establishing the northern border of the United States at the 49th parallel. In studying these treaties and the laws you must always look at the words because they always have a relevance. Citing the Convention as to boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of 1842 Article IV states:
"All grants of land heretofore made by either party, within the limits of the territory which by this treaty falls within the dominions of the other party, shall by held valid, ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant..."
This section states that any property rights would be honored. In 1863 there was a "Treaty for Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay Company, etc." Article I states in part:
"...it was stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation of the territory south of the 49th parallel of the north latitude, as provided in the first article of the said treaty, (1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should by respected."
The verbiage is identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of the rockies and similar to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all of this in these two treaties is that Chicago was a fort or outpost of the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and most definitely by 1863 Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption that the Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties are there.
Remember that the original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company control over all trade and travel to and from the "waters". Chicago today is a free port under maritime. With control of the travel and trade granted in the original charter, it most probably means that the Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the railroads, ports and roads in Chicago and probably does so to this day. The Hudson's Bay Company was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that Chicago, at least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American soil and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown! That's "Why Chicago"!
When one is into researching this type of data you never know what you may find. While digging through the books I found the Proclamation of 1763 in the Documents of American History. Within this Proclamation we see the King of England establishing four new governments, one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in West Florida and one in Grenada.
All of this got us to thinking. Why is the King of England setting up government in these obviously French and Spanish territories? We discovered that France and Spain had fought a war against England and concluded it with a treaty in Paris in February of 1763. The Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year. We determined that these aforementioned territories falling under British control shows that they were "prizes of war" and taken under treaty. The relevance of all of this comes to light when you look at the fact that we supposedly bought the "Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How could we buy the Floridas from Spain if Spain gave them to England as war prizes?
The question led us to the Treaty of Friendship of 1795. Within the treaties of Spain at that time the King of Spain was always referred to as His Catholic Majesty. But within the document of 1795 we find a reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference and not an oversight. Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states:
"And if on any account it should be found necessary that the said Commissioners and Surveyors should be accompanied by guards, they shall be furnished in equal proportions by the commanding officer of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..."
As it appears from the distinction between His Catholic Majesty and His Majesty, there were British occupying forces in the Floridas. Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario: The King of England took over the territories of the Floridas. The King of Spain had subjects in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere. the King of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights to the cities, i.e. the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the United States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas it only bought the Spanish cities.
When you read the treaty of 1819 where the deal was made "His Majesty" appears again. From the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had to petition "His Majesty's foreign minister" to get permission to make the sale. The British control of the Floridas also helps explain why Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans" during the war of 1812... the British had a vested land interest!
Grandma states that the British troops were probably expelled, if they were not already gone, by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though there was no physical occupation by the British, the Crown still maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This could explain why Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program started. It also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil War, they were part owners!
Another point that must be considered is that as well educated as the generation of the Founders was, they must have known of the British ownership of the Floridas. Something of that magnitude could not be reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that there may possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States government and the Crown.
Not of us was ever taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this all into question. I am of the firm conviction nowadays that anything that is hidden in hidden for a reason.
We've proven, through treaties and charters that the Hudson's Bay Company owned Chicago and the travel and tread thereto which includes more than likely the Chicago Transit Authority, the Port Authority, the municipal water works, power and telecommunications companies, and the railroads.
Notice on the list of CSG Associates how many public utilities and public transpiration companies are affiliated. The following will establish the ADL aspect or the Khazarian connection. Citing from EIR's book, Dope, Inc.:
"The probe turned up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with Jewish gangsters, from Meyer Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary Dope, Inc. figures such as Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam Riklis, and the ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for the Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also discovered that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from leading families of Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes trace back to the British banks and trading companies that ran the opium clipper ships in and out of China in the last century."
Take note of the name Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia during the Kennedy administration. Lansky had definitive connections in Miami which still serves as a major point of ingress to this country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General Janet Reno comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up all manner of corruption in the book Votescam and by other individuals who worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she was picked as USAG specifically because of her probably ties directly into Metro.
The Khazarian Bronfman family owns the Seagrams empire which you will note is a corporate associate of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking interests include J.P. Morgan & Associates. Per the citing from Dope, Inc. these selfsame organizations serve as contributors to the ADL.
The Great Chicago fire occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of Claims with the Hudson's Bay Company back to the Crown. One of the prime methods of deleting land titles and records is by fire. You will find great numbers of burned houses of records in Peru, Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South during the Civil War in order to expunge deeds as well as the original 13th Amendment.
Franklin Roosevelt once said that in politics there are no coincidences. It is too coincidental that two years after the Crown took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay Company the city of Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it would be to destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in America. Grolier's National Encyclopedia states:
"The Great Fire destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000, which did not destroy the hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in two years..."
That means about $1 million per acre! We've done some figuring on just where that $178 million came from and this is what we came up with. Of Course, this is speculation based on certain real factors. In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we discussed the Gold Railroad bonds issued during the Grant administration that made certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted. These bonds totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance policy (Tontine) on someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied by about 1,500 deaths and that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on property loss runs about $100 million what with residential and commercial property, railroads, grainaries and cattle yards. That leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that the banks that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks which made up the other $11 million which caused reverberations throughout the nation causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of this:
Railroad bonds........................ $62 million
Property loss and death insurance.....$100 million
Bank loans called in...................$11 million
Which would leave $5 million to be balanced between the property damage, loss of life and the bank note calls equaling the $178 million required to rebuild. It is our contention that most of this money came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds in order to build a new "capitol" city in America from which to launch the New World Order through the Agent called Metro.
"In 1890, Lake Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received Chicago's sewage...the Chicago River, when the canal was brought in, reversed its course to flow into the Mississippi..."
- (Groliers - 1939)
With the Settlement of the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863 giving the lawful possessors of land control of the lands adjoining the water; with the burning of all titles and deeds to prove ownership being burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what a wonderful opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the Hudson's Bay Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the claims probably lost in court as they could not produce their deeds or titles due to the fire. do you see how neat it is? And on top of that it is a possibility that the assets of the major people involved had been spirited away and stored before "Mrs. O'leary's cow" started the fire. Could the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance scam and power play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself? The record of provable deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so we don't think this is beyond the realm of possibility. Especially when they modus operandi is the same, only on a larger scale.
Throughout this series we have laid out substantial proof of our assertions, which, upon investigation will prove out the charges levied of sedition, fraud, theft and treason. The United States government, in concert with the British/Zionist/Communist controlled Metro organizations and it's Governors' Conference of the fifty State Governors has worked continuously to destroy this nation.
Even if we are incorrect in our assessment and potential reasons for the Great Fire of 1871, (and we don't think we are), there is still more than enough evidence to convict these traitors in any court of true justice.
In 1908 the Council of Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress in reference to Conservation. This 1908 Declaration reads very similar to the RAMSAR, and Bio-diversity treaty currently put forth through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately tied into Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress. The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors Declaration on Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE CONTROL" of the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as well as for soil and forest conservation. Sounds just like the enviromentalist's "green" agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that that is exactly what it is.
It appears that anywhere between 20-40 years before these treaties, declarations and laws are to take effect, by the 99 years rule under the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create groups to push for the acceptance of the already decided change. That figures out to be 1-2 generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance. Look at how hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance through the cartoons your children watch and the commercials being aired on recycling. We are all being herded like cattle into the new Metro-ized society of the New World Order of British-Israel.
We all know that the flooding of the Midwest in the last two to three yours is unnatural. Is it possible that these floods are not accidental? With the rerouting and reversing of the Chicago River and it dumping into the Mississippi the backwash would not be evident at the headwaters but would flood downstream. does the connection to the Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a broadened area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who profits?
These articles are supposed to make you think and maybe do something to save your country and yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all for you. You have to help expose the lie, and many of you are.
In the last article we showed how the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913, but forgot to mention that two other British controlled organizations came into this country as well, the American Bar Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through the research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others it has been revealed that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British Intelligence arm MI-6 and is a spying and propaganda organization here to do nothing but to promote the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism.
The Intimate ties are there between the Khazarian elite and the royal heads of Europe and have been intertwined for centuries. This nation has stood as a bar to worldwide feudalism for the last two centuries, but the efforts by these same entities to destroy this nation and her people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of attention, de-education and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some blame lies with Metro et al., the rest lies with us.
Sources: Documents of American History - Commager U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements. Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911 Dope, Inc. EIR Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Orange County California Newspaper
Newspapers simply won't publish letters to the editor
which they either deem politically incorrect (read below) or
which does not agree with the philosophy they're pushing
on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor
that should have been published; but, with your help it will
get published via cyberspace!
From: 'David LaBonte'
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor
of the OC Register which, of course, was not printed. So, I
decided to 'print' it myself by sending it out on
the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written
in response to a series of letters to the editor in the
Orange County Register:
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how
this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one,
suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because
the people now in question aren't being treated the same
as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out
to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not
willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer.
Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe
to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship
and stand in a long line in New York and be documented .
Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss
the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and
support their new country in good and bad times. They made
learning English a primary rule in their new American
households and some even changed their names to blend in
with their new home.
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give
their children a new life and did everything in their power
to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing
was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor
laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and
craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a
future of prosperity.
Most of their children came of age when World War II
broke out. My father fought alongside men whose parents had
come straight over from Germany, Italy, France, and Japan
None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought
about what country their parents had come from. They were
Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of
Japan. They were defending the United States of America as
When we liberated France, no one in those villages were
looking for the French-American or the German- American or
the Irish-American. The people of France saw only Americans.
And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not
one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking
up another country's flag and waving it to represent who
they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents
who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants
truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the
melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are in 2008 with a new kind of immigrant who
wants the same rights and privileges, only they want to
achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one
that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being
faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's
not what being an American is all about. I believe that the
immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early
1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard
work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a
land that has become a beacon for those legally searching
for a better life I think they would be appalled that they
are being used as an example by those waving foreign country
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of
Liberty, it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are
voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking
about dismantling the United States just yet.
(signed) Rosemary LaBonte
KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING . FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL
THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET!!
LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!!
I sincerely hope this letter gets read by millions of
people all across the nation!!
Saturday, October 18, 2008
For a long time, I felt that our "presidential" elections were to elect the president of the Corporation, NOT the 50 states United. I guess I was correct, and to be correct, do you want Obama or McCain as President and CEO of the United States Incorporated, a Delaware corporation.
Begin Post here:::::
Great Britain owns USA
By: Stephen Kimbol Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15). Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace (1738) * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money that is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible that the King funded both sides of the War? But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States came to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so-called founding
fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was titled - An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up.
The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we've got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto (by the fact itself) a citizen of the United States.
A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person (artificial- person). "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272" Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no States, just Corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a Corporation. A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.
Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.
Article Six Section One keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts
contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two that states “Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States”. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.
The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank (just like the Federal Reserve Bank) of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States, which included the King, wanted to be paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the Militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes from the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the “floundering” fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.
America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!! If you don't believe it read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states, "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) that states that it is the Militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16). It states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States. The Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is there to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity,
Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794, which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.
Here is the key to were this started: Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactments and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish Shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that Great Britain owns the Jews and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is where all of our problems originate. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist.
Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520.
You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.
Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of an infant is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the State." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under
government." Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File that is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series that shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.
The form that is supposed to be used for this is Form 8288, IRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 Form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred
Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.?
Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so-called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to its udders? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all, breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor? You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don't want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be- slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist,
because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them. I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down. You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.
Now to Rome. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3)Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?
The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.
I could go on and on, his is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let this information scare you because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations that are nothing but fictional entities that have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your slavery was because you believed a lie.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
(begin copied post)
Subject: Commentary on the financial mess
I think that this is a pretty insightful commentary by a pilot who flies life flight rescue helicopters in Texas.
Ok, let's all take a little time to connect the dots. And the dots are all over the place. Although, in catching up here, I suspect some of my thoughts will appear to be a little random since there is so much ground to cover.
First, nothing really bad is going to happen to the average public citizen on the street as a result of the current "crisis". If you have good credit, you can get a loan. Banks are still in the business of making a profit and they can't do it if they don't loan money. If you have bad credit, you will not be able to get a big loan, which is nature's way of telling you to get off your ass and take care of business.
Giving Paulson $700B would be insane at a level beyond belief. (And here is a good place to connect some dots.) Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. He had a net worth of about $750M, much of it tied up in Goldman Sachs stock. GS holds a 20% stake in AIG. Paulson has seen his net worth drop about $283M over the past several weeks. Propping up Wall Street would allow him to recover millions. Now, any wonder that he was practically on his knees to get a deal out of Congress?
Pelosi is a moron, but then I repeat myself. What she did in giving that pre-vote hate speech was either some kind of tactic to implode the plan, or she is one of the most stupid Speakers to ever hold the office. She isn't clever enough for the former so I suspect the latter.
More dots. The same Wall Street, Ivy League-trained, brainiacs who helped generate this mess are now telling the unwashed that a bailout is the only way out. They punctuate it with dire predictions of lost jobs, tardy payrolls, credit crunches, and hair loss. And we have the Administration and Congressmen agreeing to give them $700B because they believe these guys? I wouldn't trust these MBA's with my lunch money. Momma always said, "stupid is as stupid does".
So what if the stock market tanks? You only lose money if you sell low and you only make money if you sell high. And the only time you want the market to hit a high is when you are ready to retire and cash out. We don't have a stock market collapse. We have a great opportunity to get in there and buy some good deals. You might want to steer clear of financials however.
Your house isn't worth what you paid for it. No, I'm not talking about the drop in home values. I'm talking about the actual physical, glass, metal, wood, stone, thatched presence you call home. Values are dropping toward what they should really be, not some inflated equity producing mirage it's been over the past 5 years. I've been renting and refusing to buy for about that long because the prices were ridiculous. I'm house shopping now because I can get a good deal from someone who thought their house was actually an ATM.
Blame game dots. Despite the deniers, we have Bwaney Fwanks on video telling us several years ago that Fannie and Freddie were in great shape and needed no regulations even though his own President at the time was warning of a problem. Bush did the same thing. WHO blocked legislation? Bwaney Fwank and Chris Dodd, the biggest recipient of Fannie political contributions.
Oh pls, stop the crap about how the Republican minority is always able to block Democrat legislation while on the other hand, the Republicans are responsible for getting nothing through when they are in the majority. As if Democrat minorities never block legislation. You can't have it both ways. Think about it a minute before going to your standard BS reply. Go ahead, work it through your brain for just a few seconds. It will come to you. Ok, here is the answer. Dems and Republicans were co-conspirators.
No CEO is worth millions a year. We have an economic battlefield littered with corporate pay and million dollar Christmas bonuses that are simply incomprehensible. Fannie Mae's Franklin Raines pocketed $90M for 6 years of work. Now, does anyone really believe that any human is worth $1.25M A MONTH? Especially when they fail at their job? In China, Franklin Raines would have been executed and his family billed for the bullet. I'm not saying we should go that far but he should at least volunteer and put his own gun to his head along with the rest of the greedy CEOs.
But back to dots. Here's one for you. Anyone remember the "20th 9/11 conspirator", Jamie Gorelick? Working for the Janet Reno DOJ, she authored the doctrine of separating CIA and FBI intelligence sharing that was pivotal in the Government not being able to connect the dots about the hijackers and their aviation training. (Did she do this to monitor and protect Clinton?) After that debacle, she ends up on the Congressional committee that held hearings on 9/11. Unbelievable. (Was she there to protect the Clinton administration and to cover for Sandy Burgler's removal of document from the national archives?) Next dot. Gorelick ends up working at Fannie Mae and pockets $25M for about three years of work. Payback at worst. Incredible incompetence at best.
Next dot. As shown on other threads, Fannie Mae's largest political contribution went to Chris Dodd. Yep, same guy who teamed with Bwaney Fwank to stonewall government oversight of Fannie and Freddie. Sorry, my parisan left amigos. It's on video. Who you gonna believe, Bwaney Fwank or your lying eyes?
Next dot. Who is the second largest receipient of Fannie political contributions? Why, the junior no-time-in-grade Illinois Senator, Barrack Obama. (Try to keep up here, folks.) Why do you suppose that happened? Well, you have to go back to that "community organizer" thing in Chicago. Obama was schooled on "community organizing" by the founder of ACORN and served as a trainer for ACORN folks. ACORN, of course, is the organization that started leaning on banks to make loans to people who couldn't pay them back. They picketed, threatened, and otherwise bullied lending institutions into giving in or facing all kinds of disruptions. Then we have Clinton's Secretary of HUD, Andrew Cuomo who forced Fannie and Freddie to buy the bad paper of sub-prime borrowers so po' folk could "afford" a home they couldn't actually afford. Of course, one of ACORN's main objectives is to "organize communities" into registered voters. ACORN organizations and members are the subject of criminal investigations in 10 states for voter fraud and a number of ACORN members have already been convicted and sent to jail. More are sure to go. The Dems also tried to attach about $4M, IIRC, on to the bailout bill that would go to ACORN. What was that all about? Buying more votes maybe?
So to recap, we have dots of ACORN, OBAMA, Raines, Fannie Mae, Dodd, Obama, Bailout, and ACORN. Put some numbers on them, draw the connecting lines, and you have the outline of a crap sandwich these crooks, and Congrss (but I repeat myself again) are trying to feed to the public.
Other supporting morons.
GW. Please, no more speeches about how serious this is and how the country is circling the drain if we don't bail out Wall Street. I like you GW but I even tell my friends when the BS is too deep.
McCain. You dropped the ball on this one. With American sentiment running 100:1 against the bailout, you should have come up on the net absolutely opposed to the bailout. Instead, you really did prove that you don't know much about the economy. You missed the shot of a lifetime by not looking Obama square in the eye at the debate and demanding that he give back the $123,000 he took from Fannie Mae because that money came from hard working citizens who paid their mortgage. You could have made Obama buy a $123,000 ticket to the debate but you blew it.
Paulson. Do the right thing. Resign, go home, start the car up in the garage, and go to sleep.
DOJ. Either disband, or open up criminal investigations into the conduct of CEOs who were talking up their stock only weeks prior to their companies going under. I'm pretty sure there are laws against this. Convict and jail these greedy bastards. Maybe then, Harvard and the other MBA schools will add something to the curriculae about business ethics and the perils of screwing with the public's money.
Lindsey Graham. Remove your lips from McCain's ass, quit scaring people about their jobs, go back home and finish your career as a shyster lawyer.
Chris Cox, SEC Chairman. Go home with Paulson and sit in the passenger seat.
Parting shot. The most important reason we should not support a Government bailout is that the MBA whiz kids and the corrupt politicians who got us into this mess will learn absolutely nothing from the experience. They will go right back to the trough and work without shame or consequence because they know the Guvment will bail them out again. Just like folks who pay off their kids' credit cards, they will go out and do it again. They think they have us over a barrel. They don't. Nothing bad is going to happen to us. Banks will fail. Other will feed on them and get stronger. Companies who can't make payroll will fail. Others will feed on them and become stronger. People who thought their homes were banks will become poorer for the experience. Others, who waited and saved their money, will be living in a newer home and will get stronger.
I fly at bases in a couple of small towns. Nobody is talking gloom and doom. They just go to work every day and do their job. Oil prices are dropping, the dollar made the strongest gain against foreign money markets in 15 years, the price of gas is dropping closer to $3 a gallon, the county fair was a big hit again this year, and they are still playing football on Friday nights. It's all gonna be fine.
The best advice for anyone who is all verklempt about this is to visit the doctor for a hysterical paroxism and a couple of beers. It's all going to be ok.
Just my opinion. I could be wrong.
(End copied post)
Monday, September 29, 2008
When the idiots in the House who voted yea speaks of how not passing this bill will hurt Main Street, they are trying to put a guilt trip on America. They are liars, plain and simple.
If they really gave a damn about you or me, they would give the 700 billion in interest free loans to the PEOPLE to help them keep their homes. If the Banksters really needed money and had a cash flow problem, LOWER THE FREAKIN' INTEREST RATE TO THE PRESENT HOMEOWNER AND CANCEL THE ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGE, GIVE THE HOMEOWNER A FIXED RATE, and the banksters would be awash with cash.
If they gave the money to the homeowner facing foreclosure they could pay their mortgage and the banksters would STILL get the money.
All this bill does is enrich the banksters so they can take YOUR money and loan it out to YOU
Bottom line, you would pay for the money to give to the banks, then you have to pay it AGAIN
in the form of a loan, plus interest. We the tax payer will end up paying 1.4 trillion on that
700 billion package.
They have NO care or concern for the homeowner, and they will try again soon, telling you that you need this bill to go through. And tell them to remember, they are up for re-election this year, so they should keep their suitcase nearby.
Fire them all!
All those low interest, no down, no qualifying loans were made on PURPOSE, and with the Adjustable Rate Mortgage in the fine print, THEY KNEW exactly what they were doing, and they knew exactly what the results would be when the A.R.M's kick in.
But you think this is bad? Wait until the Social Security bill comes around to "save" the
system. That will be the straw that breaks the camels back.
At that time, I would not be surprised to read of a virus outbreak that kills 50 million elderly
people. Wow, that would save the SS system! 50 million less checks to mail out!
Every Year almost, Rep. Ron Paul puts up a bill to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and every year it never makes it out of committee and never, NEVER has there EVER been a single Rep co-sign the bill, never. So, keep that in mind, YOUR rep thinks the illegal federal reserve system is GOOD,
and he or she must think that a debt based monetary system is great!
They are either fools, idiots or spineless career criminals who should be charged under the RICO act.
FIRE THEM ALL!
Do them a favor this year, VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE, you may just save their life!
Don't email them, FAX them or write them, call them or visit them, with the simple message,
"YOU ARE FIRED!"
Keep me posted!
Monday, September 8, 2008
It won't be easy! It's hard to know exactly what is truth and what is fallacy. Some say we lost our nation when the Federal Reserve Act kicked in, stealing our labor and hi-jacking our economy. Some say it was after the Civil War, when the North beat the South and and installed a military government in the South, in lieu of a Civilian government. The creation of the citizenship of the District of Columbia, via the 14th Amendment didn't free anyone, it made everyone else slaves to the District of Columbia. Courts have many times ruled you can be a State Citizen and not a "Federal Citizen". That is plausible due to the fact that the real Civilian American flag is pretty rare these days, even unknown to most, and instead the common military flag now flies everywhere. Not to be confused with the flags with the gold fringe, as those represent Admiralty Law Jurisdiction. That is why you see it IN the courthouse, but not OUTSIDE the courthouse. You see it everywhere that accepts money from the US Government Inc. Schools, military, libraries, etc.
Some will even go so far as to say we lost our nation when the Articles of Confederation between the states was replaced with the Current defunct Constitution.
Some will say it was with the creation of the Corporation known as the United States of America, Inc. Chartered in (I think) Delaware. I believe that it is THIS corporation who borrowed money and went bankrupt in the 30's or so and allowed the people who had nothing to do with the Corporation to believe that it was the 50 States United who were bankrupt.
Regardless of "when" or "how" the sovereign people of this nation became overthrown
by greedy criminals is not the point really, other than history.
There are hundreds, if not thousands of websites, and thousands if not tens of thousands of blogs that "educate" the reader with news, stories, pictures and videos of corrupt government, criminal activities of government both past and current. Governments who have usurped the rights and liberties of the people. Will this do any good? Time will tell. With Congressional and whitehouse approval ratings down to around 20 percent, that means 80 percent think they should be fired. Our elected officials don't care what the people think, they know Americans aren't going to do anything but yak yak yak about how bad it is, or to become.
Voting as become useless. With vote fraud running rampant fair elections are a thing of the past, at least on the national levels.
Marches? They pretty much seem to be useless, other than the money hotel/motel owners make, and the oil companies for 100,000 people to drive to DC. Congress tends
to close the blinds so they don't have to be bothered by their constituents. It is said that politicians are the only people who create problems then campaign against the problems they themselves created.
Petitions? Hardly worth the paper they are written on. I've seen these petitions on the internet. Sign your name to the bottom, and forward it to all your friends, then the 10,000th name should forward it to someone at dot gov. And when it arrives, a simple "delete" and they don't have to deal with it, they have more important things to do, raise money for their pet projects (themselves).
What's left? The Ammo box? I hope not! But that is what the 2nd Amendment is all
about. That is why it follows the 1st Amendment, freedom of speech. When our voices are silenced through Vote Fraud, when they are silenced by turning a blind eye to the marchers, when they are silenced by deleting your petitions, your phone calls, your fax's, there is only one way to get their attention and get them to listen to the true sovereign people of a nation.
Will that happen in America? Who knows. If it does, the next question is when? Would it be AFTER the NAU is in effect? or after the next false-flag operations that causes Martial law nation-wide. Will it be too late then?
With the Federal Reserve, they pay the government around 5 cents or so for each paper Federal Reserve Note, and then loan it out in to circulation at face value plus interest. A $100 bill costs the Fed about 5 cents, but the tax payer has to pay back the full $100 value plus prime rate interest. What a scam that is! But
to save the 5 cents, they borrow nothing to the US, but the US has to pay back the nothing in labor. A "loan" from the Central Bank is nothing more than an entry in the log book, nothing changes hands. The US says we need a billion dollars, the FED makes a note saying "O.K., you now have a billion dollars in your ledger and that's the end of it.
The Federal Reserve Act requires the debts be paid off in "lawful money", which is still gold or silver. The trillions of national debt can NOT be paid back in Federal Reserve Notes. You can NOT pay a debt with a debt. Making a payment to the FED is like paying your Visa with your Mastercard. Plain and simple.
Congress has the power (or at least used to have the power) to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, but they choose not to. In Fact, Congress CHOOSES to not do a lot of things for this nation and it's people.
Who owns the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank?
* Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
* Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
* Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy
* Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam
* Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
* Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
* Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
* Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
The FED has never been audited, nor has the FED's Collection agency, the Internal
Revenue Service been audited. They just collect money from hard working people to pay for the loans a rogue corporation makes, The United States Inc.
Who is to blame? The Congress? The President? Or is it the delegates who elect the criminals because Candidate A's lies sound more promising than Candidate B's lies? If Obama wins and destroys this nation, I blame the delegates who put him in power. Same goes for McCain. I personally will not vote for the difference of which smells the least, the trash truck or the sewer.
Is I said, I would hate to have a real armed revolution. I assume there are many who are prepared. And let me say this. You can have 100 guns, and unless you have ammo for them, they are nothing more than door-stops or boat anchors. One possible scenario is the Obama gets elected, and then eliminated by our own rogue government, and they fuel and fan the racist flames to begin a nationwide race war. Imagine the ammo expended in that one? When the dust settles and the last shot is fired; the ammo all gone, they come in and mop up. United we stand, divided we fall.
At that point, bitch all you want. Instead of ignoring you, they can just lock you up or shoot you on the spot, and there is not a damned thing anyone can or will do at that point in time.
What other solution? I keep thinking of a group of people, 5 or 10 thousand strong begin CIVIL lawsuits against most of Congress and top whitehouse administration, and NOT suing the United States Government, but the INDIVIDUAL PERSON, with a court injunction preventing them from using taxpayer monies for their defense or taxpayer lawyers to defend them in the CIVIL TORTS.
For every one who loses, they will be bankrupt and out of politics. Millions of dollars in donations to finance the civil suits, and the monies won could go for the next round of Civil suits, until they are all bankrupt and out of business.
I see this as a last ditch effort to save America for Americans. If 100,000 Americans would kick in just $10 a week, that's 4 million a month to cover massive
civil suits against the individual members of Congress who voted in violation of their oaths and the Constitution, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, and caused the people a hardship
with losses. All we need are a dozen lawyers to take on the project and not worry about being Fosterized, Clintonized or forced Suicided.
Isn't it time?
Saturday, August 23, 2008
We know that Obama is not Israels choice for President for the United States. Perhaps Obama is not secure enough in their pockets, who knows.
Did Obama really pick Biden of his own free will, or did Israel tell Obama "you will never become president unless you name who we tell you to name for your running mate. Enter stage far left, Joseph Biden, who's childhood dream was to grow up as a Zionist. His own words tell the story, how basically the US could not even exist without "our dear friend" Israel.
To me, if the Obama/Biden ticket wins the prize, AND if Obama survives his four year term, we will have a full-blown card-carrying Zionist who will have Israels back first, and he will not hesitate to have American blood shed before Israel sheds blood. Biden will assure Israel that he will put THEIR needs ahead of ours. Americans, the Constitution and our way of life will take a far back seat in the bus of policies. He will assure Israels' policies for America are enacted.
What does this nation need? A Congress with a pair. A very big pair! Made of brass, preferably.
I can't wait to see who McCain is told to have for his running mate!
Monday, August 11, 2008
Israel wants war with Iran, but they do not want to get their own nose bloody, and why should they when they have red-blooded American boys and girls to die for a lie?
Russia has said clearly that an attack by the U.S. or Israel against Iran will be considered an attack on Russia. China gets a bulk of their oil from Iran. Neither China or Russia wants their oil supplies interrupted. China also hold a Trillion or two of our debt. Our failing dollar could not stand the shock if China dumped it on the market.
Now we have an armada of warships headed for the Persian Gulf, and I think we all know what that means. The U.S. government has now become a rouge terrorist state and even made the Canadian list of terrorist states. Our rogue government now approves of torture, invasion, war without Congressional Acts of a formal Declaration of War.
With Bush in China, I am sure he is making deals with China, Stay out of our way when Israel orders our military to Attack Iran, and we will turn a blind eye when you attack Taiwan. Perhaps their goals are more lofty, like Hong Kong and Japan, certainly Tibet.
Why would that happen? Well look at what is happening today in Georgia. Georgia is a NATO member. Where is the NATO support? Where is the U.S.? This is what the already weary Georgian
soldiers are asking themselves. They thought that NATO would come in and help them with their conflict with Russia.
I believe that America cut a deal with Russia that NATO will turn a blind eye to Russian aggression against Georgia, a former member of the Soviet Union. The Georgians are so pro-American, they even named a street after George W. Bush. Boy were they ever duped by an evil war criminal. In return, Russia needs to turn a blind eye to the preemptive attack of Iran by the U.S., oh, and maybe Israel will actually use one of their non-existing shinny new nukes.
Since Israel has a larger presence in US Government than ever before, their ideals are being reflected in US foreign policies. Israel trains our police in anti-terrorist activities, as well they should be experts at terrorism, Israel itself has been engaged in terrorist activities for a long time. 9/11 comes to mind. Israeli companies supply security for American Nuclear facilities, that should help you sleep at night. Israeli companies have full access to all American telephone records. Now I understand that most people who live in Israel do not set foreign policies, and they too are just expendable pawns by their government as we Americans are just expendable pawns to our government. We just want to make a living and have some peace and enjoyment in our lives. We do not make Foreign polices.
My BEST case fantasy scenario would be the US tells Israel "Don't worry buddy, we got your back",
and we even get in position. Then, when Israel starts sending in their missiles, Iran retaliates and takes out the "state of" Israel, and the US slowly puts their ships in reverse, once and for all eliminating the the terrorist state that was created with the Balfour Declaration. Russia understands the ills of the Bolshevik revolution when the Zionists overthrew the Christian Romanov empire and created Communism. Now we are in the same position as Russia was in 1917. Russia finally grew a pair and got rid of the Zionists. Will we do the same?
With the new replacements of upper brass in the military being replaced with Zionist loving generals and Admirals, the American Military Machine is finally under full Israeli control. Are there enough red-blooded upper brass Americans left who will say "NO" and arrest the Zionist generals and Admirals?
Remember, "I was just doing my job and following orders" will NOT be a defense at your trial by the Constitutional government OF the people. I think the People will hang you by the neck until dead, or maybe the people will just take you out and leave you for buzzard food.
My only question left, since the criminals in our government have given the name "America" a bitter disgusting taste in the mouths of the rest of the world, I wonder if anyone out there will aid the people in restoring this nation to its previous glory, if and when the curtains rise for the American Revolution part II. I think America is a powder keg, waiting for the one little spark to set off the fireworks, in a chain reaction that has not been seen for over 200 years.
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Folks, it's just a matter of time before it escalates into heavy gun fire. Our own so called elected officials seem to refuse to act, or allow other law enforcement agencies from acting. This is a Federal problem, and the blame lies squarely on their laps. Our extreme liberal government is fearful of hurting anyones' feelings, (other than those it is charged with serving, we the people), and they will continue to allow other rogue nations to run roughshod over our borders, harassing and stealing from our own people. Must the people themselves react with arms to control our own border, since this is definitely an invasion of an armed military body.
I have always taken the stand of "Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way". This is the message that needs to be sent to our own "rogue government". Either FIX the problems of this nation, or follow the lead of the people, by enacting strict laws protecting our borders, or get the hell out of the way!
Both Obama and McCain will absolutely make things worse. They are both lap-dogs of the elite Military/Medical/Corporate establishments. Obama will take this nation in to a deep depression faster than McCain will, but the results are only a matter of "sooner or later", but it will happen with either of them at the helm.
The Communists once said they would bury us, and it will be called Socialism. Obama is a major
Socialist who wants to jack your taxes up to aid foreign nations to the tune of TRILLIONS! Folks, this nation does not have TRILLIONS, it is the most indebted nation of Earth, and it's is
my opinion that this was planned a long time ago for the sole purpose of destroying the once great Republic of America. With dozens upon dozens of back-room meetings, secret treaties and agreements, they are literally putting the frog in the cool water and heating it up slowly until
This nation belongs to the people, not the elite, and I don't care if the bulk of federal land and oil reserves are held in trust against the bankruptcy of the early 1900's. The District of Columbia has no Constitutional right to get in debt and expect the people to voluntarily enslave themselves.
If it takes 10,000 citizens to protect our border with arms, then so be it, and let not the rogue government get in the way. It would be the will of the people.
My county and state broadcast commercials on the radio telling the people to be prepared for days, weeks, months, without food, potable water or utilities. They say "you will be on your own to survive". I think they are sugarcoating it a bit. I think it can and will get very bad.
For those who are interested, we have a forum with discussions about gardens, storing and preserving foods, discussions on survivalism, news items, good ideas and bad ideas, etc. You can browse, but you can not post or participate without a simple account.
Those who do not prepare for the worst, and hope for the best will probably have neither. It is better to have and not need, than to need and not have. Agree?
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
[From National Geographic, Vol.183, No.1 Jan.1993, pg105]
Titled: The Power of Money, by Peter T White, Asst. Editor,
quoting his sources as the "Center for International
Documentation of Organized and Economic Crime, located
in Cambridge, England.
[begin this section]
This as a real-life example:
A U.S. organized crime group with a lot of hot cash forms a cozy
relationship with the central bank of a British Commonwealth
country. Diplomats of that country carry the cash out of the
U.S. If it's $10,000 or more, they are supposed to report that
to U.S. Customs, but they don't; they "externalize" the cash.
It goes into the central bank and then into various dummy companies
in different countries in return for shares in those companies.
The money is thus "agitated," so it'll be just about impossible for
investigators to follow. Then, to "repatriate" the money, dummy
companies in the U.S. sell their worthless shares to investors in
Britain - who are in fact in on the scam - and behold, the money
is back in the U.S., clean! Now it buys legitimate businesses,
banks, political power.
An operation like this, involving highly placed officials, and
businessmen, will cost quite a bit, maybe 35 percent, but once
the system is in place, people will want to use it - not only
drug profiteers but also arms dealers, terrorist organizations,
A prime haven for such shady customers was BCCI, the Bank of
Credit and Commerce International, headquartered in Luxembourg
and the Cayman Islands with branches in 72 countries. It is said
to have secretly controlled the First American Bank of Washington, D.C.
After BCCI collapsed in 1991, having defrauded depositors of several
billion dollars, it became known as the Bank of Crooks and
[End, this section]
In the very next section, there is an interesting little number
used by the bank/finance crowds, it's number "72".
[begin this section]
- the rule of 72. No one is certain who first developed the rule,
but the principle is quite simple: Divide any number into 72 and
the answer tells how long it will take for a sum to double in
Are you charged 18 percent interest on the unpaid balance of your
credit card account? Eighteen goes into 72 four times - so the
debt would double in four years. Say your annual raise is 6
percent; that number goes into 72 twelve times, so in twelve
years your salary will double. The same holds true of any
investment. And what if inflation runs at 6 percent a year?
Then after a dozen years your money will be worth half as much,
so in a sense you'll be back where you started.
[end this section]
I wonder if the money-changers figured this into setting annual inflation rates!
Kind of keeps the middle class down, and stuck in a rut.
"We conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities
for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent,
privately owned and locally controlled corporations"
Lewis v. U.S. F.2d (1982)
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Remember all of the promises that were made in the past about lowering taxes, smaller government, fixing the tax code and reducing the national debt?
None of it has happened, maybe this guy has the right idea....
By Charlie Reese
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.
Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ .
If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
What you do with this article now that you have read it is up to you, though you appear to have several choices.
1. You can send this to everyone in your address book, and hope they do something about it.
2. You can agree to vote against everyone that is currently in office, knowing that the process will take several years.
3. You can decide to run for office yourself and agree to do the job properly.
4. Lastly, you can sit back and do nothing, or re-elect the current bunch.
YOU DECIDE, BUT AT LEAST SEND IT TO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK, MAYBE SOMEONE IN THERE WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!