10/95 Amtrak Derailment inside-job

Most won't remember, or at worst even know of the 1995 Amtrak derailment in southern
Arizona, attempting to blame it on "citizens militias". An obvious inside job.

While you read this interesting article, keep in mind who was the Exec. Vice Pres of Amtrak at the time of this, listed in the roster of the CFR.

NORMAN, WILLIAM S. (CFR 6/30/92 ROSTER)
To 1992: Exec. Vice Pres. AMTRAK (National RR Passenger Corp.)
(1992)



Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 10 Num. 20
=======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")


-----------------------------------------------------------------

BEHIND THE OCTOBER 1995 AMTRAK DERAILMENT
=========================================

This excerpt, written by David Hoffman, was taken from Craig
Robert's book, "The Medussa File: Crimes and Cover-Ups of the
U.S. Government," published by Consolidated Press: 3171-A South
129th East Ave, Suite 338, Tulsa, OK 74134, 1996.

A 20-year Tulsa Police Officer (retired), and Vietnam Veteran,
Roberts wrote "Walking Dead," and "Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at
Dealy Plaza."

"The Medussa File" contains extensive sections about Oklahoma
City, TWA 800, and other crimes. Roberts has collaborated with
David Hoffman on the Oklahoma City bombing investigation.

-+-
Note: The 6/30/92 CFR Roster lists NORMAN, WILLIAM S.
as Exec. Vice Pres. of AMTRAK (National RR Passenger Corp.)


On October 9, 1995, the nation witnessed its first attack on a
passenger train, when Amtrak's "Sunset Limited" was derailed
while enroute from Phoenix to San Diego. The derailment, caused
by sabotage, resulted in over 100 injuries, including one death.

The terrorists left behind a cryptic note, calling themselves the
"Sons of the Gestapo." The mainstream press quickly jumped on
this latest "terrorist" attack, coming as it did only six months
after the Oklahoma City bombing. While no one, including
law-enforcement officials, had ever heard of the "Sons of the
Gestapo," the purveyors of deception immediately played it up as
the obvious work of a "Right-wing" militia group.

FBI officials were more cautious however, speculating that the
attack may have been the result of a "disgruntled employee."
Exhaustive searches through numerous data-bases revealed no group
called "Sons of the Gestapo," and only someone with the technical
knowledge necessary to disable a warning system on a railroad
track would be capable of executing such a stunt.

It may not have mattered however. In the aftermath of the
Oklahoma City bombing, any such attack on American citizens would
be excuse enough to push the Anti-Terrorism Bill through
Congress. And the press and anti-militia activists such as the
ADL and the SPLC were eager to jump on the militia connection.
"Sons of the Gestapo," they asserted, could only be the pseudonym
for a Right-wing hate-group.

Yet law-enforcement officials had only an enigmatic message to
guide them. The note left behind by the saboteurs railed against
the BATF and FBI for their actions at Waco and Ruby Ridge, and
stated, "This is not Nazi Germany."

Why anyone would attack a passenger train to exact revenge on
government officials for killing innocent civilians is beyond
credulity. Yet, as in the Oklahoma City case, this was the
message that the saboteurs and the government-controlled press
wanted us to believe. America was filled with hateful Right-wing
extremists who would do anything -- kill anyone, women, children,
babies -- to pursue their violent anti-government course.

As Attorney General Janet Reno announced in the Oklahoma City
case, so the local U.S. Attorney, Janet Napolitano would declare:
"We are going to pursue every bit of evidence and every lead very
thoroughly until we find the person or persons who committed this
crime."

While the FBI swarmed through Maricopa County, interrogating
local residents and harassing the few isolated "desert rats" who
inhabited the surrounding countryside, a real investigation was
being conducted by a lone Maricopa County Sheriff. With the
assistance of Craig Roberts, a retired Tulsa police officer with
military intelligence experience who worked on the Oklahoma City
investigation, the Sheriff was able to uncover some amazing
information.

What they found was that other than rescue vehicles, there were
no vehicle tracks entering or exiting the crash site. Moreover,
the site itself was extremely remote, being near the summit of
the rugged Gila Bend Mountains, which surrounded the site to the
east, north, and west. It was there, along a sharp S-curve, that
the perpetrators had pulled 29 spikes from the tracks, causing
the fatal crash.

Why had the perpetrators chosen such a remote location, Roberts
wondered? Had they picked a more accessible spot, he reasoned,
it would have surely lessened their chances of being caught, as
all they would have had to do was drive to the nearest highway.
In this case, the nearest road was Highway 8, 38 miles away,
necessitating a difficult drive over rugged terrain, at the same
time as law-enforcement officers would surely be on a heightened
state of alert.

What Roberts and his sheriff partner also discovered was that 90
minutes away by air, in Pinal County, was a mysterious air-base
known as Marana. The locked-down facility was owned by
Evergreen, Inc., a government contractor reportedly involved in
drug smuggling during the Iran-Contra period. The base, located
off of Highway 10 between Phoenix and Tucson, was the site of
strange night-time training maneuvers involving black and
unmarked military-type helicopters. Passersby had also witnessed
black-clad troops dropping into the desert en masse, using
steerable black "Paracommander" parachutes.

This began to raise some interesting possibilities. Had the
perpetrators been dropped into the site by air, then picked up by
chopper? Both Roberts and his colleague at the Sheriff's
Department were experienced military pilots. They observed that
it would have been easy for a helicopter to fly low through the
mountain passes, avoiding radar, and insert and extract a team.
As Roberts noted, "A full moon, wind out of the south at 8 knots,
and a clear sky would be an ideal night for air operations."

The possibilities of a covert paramilitary commando team being
responsible for the attack raised more than a few eyebrows at the
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, until they began
investigating a lead provided by a sympathetic FBI agent that
several hikers had seen a small group of parachuters drop into
the desert that night. They also discovered the following
information:

A VFR target squawking 1200 that left Tri-City airfield in
Albuquerque on a southwest course, climbed to 10,500 feet, then,
when it was exactly due east of the Amtrak site, turned due west
and flew a course line that took it one mile south of the site.
But just before arriving over the site, it dropped to 8,500 feet.
After crossing the target zone, it turned on a southwesterly
course towards California at 8,500 feet. Albuquerque contacted
the Los Angeles Center which tracked the aircraft to a landing at
Montgomery Field in San Diego. It crossed the valley south of
the bridge at 1940 hours (7:40 p.m.)

Since the winds that night were at 8 knots out of the south, a
drop one mile from the target site would compensate for wind
drift. Moreover, such a flight is not required to file a flight
plan listing its passengers, and an aircraft flying out of
Albuquerque, squawking on transponder 1200, wouldn't look
particularly suspicious.

When they checked with the refueler at Montgomery Field, the
records indicated that the "N" number checked to a Beachcraft,
registered to Raytheon. Raytheon owns E-systems. Like
Evergreen, E-Systems, based in Greenville, Texas, is a covert
government contractor, reportedly involved in drug-running, and
reputed to have "wet-teams" (assassination teams). The director
of E-Systems was former NSA Director and CIA Deputy Director
Bobby Ray Inman.

While it is possible a jump was made from the twin-engine
Beechcraft, a plane commonly used for such purposes, it still
left the problem of the team's extraction. With the radar track
information, the Maricopa Sheriff then went to the Air Force at
Yuma, who monitor the Aerostat radar drug balloons. The DEA
balloons have "look-down" capability for detecting low-flying
aircraft. The Master Sergeant at Yuma agreed to help out. A
short time later he called back.

"Sorry," he said. "We can't help you out."

"What? Why?" asked Jack.

"The plug's been pulled."

"What does that mean?"

The sergeant sounded very uncomfortable when he replied. "We
really wanted to check this out, but all I can say is the
balloons were down that night."

"Why?" asked Jack.

"Maintenance."

"All of them?" asked Jack, incredulously.

"Yes, sir." The sergeant sounded very nervous.

"Why?"

"All I can tell you is that they were ordered down for
maintenance. It came from above my pay grade."

One has to wonder what "above my pay grade" means. Why would all
the balloons be ordered down for maintenance? Obviously, a
cover-up was in progress.

It was beginning to sound suspiciously like the hurried
demolition of the Oklahoma Federal Building, to prevent any
independent forensic analysis of the bomb site. Or the Secret
Service removing President Kennedy's protective bubble from his
limousine; failing to secure the windows and rooftops along the
parade route; and changing the route at the last minute.

Like the two foregoing examples, only the government -- or shadow
elements within the government -- had the capability of pulling
that off. No "lone nut" or criminal syndicate could order such
last-minute changes, or orchestrate such a massive and
well-executed cover-up. Moreover, no militia group could order
all the radar balloons down on the night of the attack.

As a Maricopa County resident stated to the Arizona Republic
regarding the FBI's so-called militia theory, "Buddy, you can't
get three people out here to get together on what kind of pickup
to drive, and you think we're going to form a militia?"

Obviously, no militia would benefit from such an attack. And
what about the "Sons of the Gestapo?" As Roberts wrote: "As an
old Southeast Asia hand (a marine sniper during Vietnam), I
remember that one of the terms used by Phoenix Program assassins
working under MACV-SOG (Military Advisory Command, Studies and
Observations Group) was a twisted bar-room version of the last
acronym. "Yeah," a drunk trooper would mention. "I'm SOG a son
of the Gestapo."

The Phoenix assassination program, as previously discussed, was
organized by the CIA's William Colby, Ted Shackley, and fielded
by General John Singlaub. Singlaub commanded Second Lieutenant
Oliver North. Shackley, Singlaub, and North would go on to
orchestrate the secret and illegal Iran-Contra operation,
smuggling drugs into this country at such places as Mena,
Arkansas and Marana. {1}.

Interestingly, whenever Iran-Contra drug shipments came in for
the California run, the drug balloons under "Operation
Watchtower" were shut down. Could this be the same mechanism
that shut them down the night of the attack?

Apparently, the "Sons of the Gestapo" note left behind was a
"false flag," a distraction designed to serve a political
purpose. In this case, that purpose -- like the Oklahoma bombing
which preceded it -- was to connect the Amtrak attack with the
Patriot/Militia movement. Considering the reaction of the
mainstream press, it appears they have largely succeeded.

_____________________

{1} In fact, Singlaub is known to control at least one airfield
in Arizona.

History of Khazars/Zionism

Here is a 5 part post of different articles by different authors all in one long file. As always you can download the file to read off line by right clicking and saving it at the link. I know this is long, but if you want to know who is behind the NWO, who are the puppetmasters who pull the strings of our government, and who runs the show on a global scale, this is a must read! Print it out and share it, forward it, email it. Get the word out.

Download link: http://www.ichooseliberty.org/files/Semitism zionism report.doc

___________________________

CITIZEN'S PERSPECTIVE

September, 1995

KHAZARS; AND THE INVALIDITY OF THE TERM 'ANTI-SEMITISM'

By Rex Weeks

NOTE: For those of you reading the information on the METRO

organization, you will need to understand the following history to

grasp the big picture.

You may have noticed the term "Khazar" or "Khazarian Zionists"

popping up more frequently in articles. Many of you know who and what

this term refers to (especially CONTACT readers), but for those who

don't, you are about to get a short lesson in history which is most

pertinent to events that have led up to the "One World Order".

The following information is from several Jewish historians,

scholars, and encyclopedic sources. Because of the direct connection

with "Khazars" and Jewish people today, I feel it is important to use

Jewish sources for this information. To understand past and present

world political events, we need to understand this history.

The kingdom of the Khazars may have vanished from the maps of

today, but their affect and influence are still acutely felt. In the

fist millennia A.D. a warlike, pagan tribe of people were driven

westward from Central Asia (see Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky).

They settled in an area of what is now Southern Russia between the

Black and Caspian Seas. This was an area just beyond the boundaries

of both the Roman and Byzantine Empires. These people were called

_Khazars_ (or Chazars) and were a tribe of Mongol, Turkish and Nordic

bloodlines. Throughout the centuries, this warring tribe became the

most powerful in Asia. As early as 3 A.D. they were indentifiable in

constant warfare in Persia and Armenia. They fought alongside Attila

the Hun around 5 A.D. They were at the peak of power between the

seventh and tenth centuries A.D.

The Khazars were strategically situated at the mouth of the Volga

River, surrounded by the Caucasus mountains to the south, the Black

Sea to the west, and the Khazar Sea (now Caspian Sea) to the east.

They occupied a strategic key position in the vital gateway between

the Seas where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each

other (The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler, Jewish historian).

Khazars were not only expert warriors, but aggressive merchants. At

the peak of their power, they exacted a "tribute" (tax, extortion) of

10 percent from all traders who had to pass through their dominion.

This made them a wealthy, but despised nation. By the eighth century,

their kingdom extended as far north as Kiev, Russia. At its peak, it

encompassed one million square miles. for three of four centuries it

was an untouchable empire. How many of you have ever heard of the

Khazarian Empire?

In the eighth century (740 A.D.) something of _historic

profoundness_ occurred in this kingdom. the Khazarian king

(Kagan/Khan, Khakan or Chagan), having no religion for the kingdom

beyond pagan phallic/idolatry worship, was getting pressure from the

surrounding Christian Byzantine and Moslem empires to convert.

According to the _Universal Jewish Encyclopedia_, the Khazar chieftain

Bulan, "called representatives of Judaism, Christianity, and

Mohammedism to expound their doctrines before him". Not wanting to

associate himself with either side, so as not to incur the wrath

(hence, a potential alliance of war) against them, King Bulan _chose

as the nations religion, Talmudism_, now known as JUDAISM (and

formally known as Pharisaism). It was now a state religion. ("Facts

are Facts", by Benjamin Freedman, Jewish author and historian in a

letter to Dr. David Goldstein). From the king's conversion to

"Judaism" (we'll use the current vernacular), it was spread to the

subjects of the land, especially by one of Bulan's successors,

Obadiah. By the tenth century the ruler of Christian Russia, Vladimir

III had conquered the Khazarian empire. but this is not the end of

the story. In fact, it is only the beginning.

Before going on, reflect on what happened here. Purely as a

political decision, the Khazar kingdom became Jews en masse (although

remember, the term "Jew" did not exist at that time; Khazaria was

called, "Land of the Judahites"). As Jewish historian Benjamin

Freedman put it, "The converted Khazars were the first population of

so called or self-styled (terms from the _Jewish Encyclopedia_) "Jews"

in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe

after the conversion of the conversion of the Khazars _are the

descendants of the Khazars converted to "Talmudism", or as it is now

known "Judaism", by the 7th century mass conversion of the Khazar

population_", end quote.

Are you beginning to grasp the historical significance of the

conversion to Talmudism/Judaism by the Khazars? These historians have

determined that the "Jews" of southern Russia and eastern Europe are

the Khazarian descendants of self-chosen converts, _having nothing to

do with Biblical Hebrews yet laying claim to their heritage. Ponder

on this a moment. For further reference, let's take a quote from the

_Jewish Encyclopedia_, Vol. IV, pages 1-5 on "Chazars" (pronounced

like cos(tume)Czar. From the _Jewish Encyclopedia_: quoting:

"Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are

interwoven with _THE VERY BEGINNINGS OF THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN

RUSSIA_... driven on by nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own

desire for plunder and revenge...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly

established in _most of south Russia long before the foundation of the

Russian monarchy by the Varangians_ (Russians)...The Kingdom of the

chazars was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the

chagan (king) of the Chazars _TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS

HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION_...The Jewish population

in the entire domain of the chazars, in the period between the seventh

and tenth centuries, _must have been considerable_...about the ninth

century, _IT APPEARS AS IF ALL THE CHAZARS WERE JEWS AND THAT THEY HAD

BEEN CONVERTED TO JUDASM ONLY A SHORT TIME BEFORE_...the people were

instructed in the Bible, Mishnah and the _TALMUD_...In their writings

the _Chazars used Hebrew letters_ (applied to the phonetics of Asiatic

dialects)... The Russian varangians established themselves at Kiev..

.until the final conquest of the chazars by the Russians...Many

members of the chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain...Some went

to Hungary, _BUT THE GREAT MASS OF THE PEOPLE REMAINED IN THEIR NATIVE

COUNTRY." (end quote).

Jewish historian, Professor H. Graetz, points out in his famous

"_History of the Jews_" that when other so called or self-styled

"Jews" in other countries heard about the Jewish Khazar kingdom, they

mistakenly believed the Khazars were one of the "lost ten tribes". As

you can see from the history above, this is the furthest thing from

the truth, hence the name of Arthur Koestler's book, "The _Thirteenth_

Tribe" (indicating they were not one of the original 12 tribes of

Israel).

The Khazars took the Hebrew characters they say in the Babylonian

Talmud and applied them to the phonetics of the German, Russian,

Turkish and other dialects around them. This hybrid language was

known as _Yiddish_. Even with the disbandment of the Khazars, their

language of Yiddish survived and still today forms a common bond

between the people.

After their conquering, the Khazars of southern Russia stayed in

the area for the most part, spreading to the areas now known as

eastern Europe - Poland, Germany, Hungary - and made up the eastern

European "Jewry". From generation to generation they also passed down

a militant tradition known as _ZIONISM_ - the belief that they were a

chosen people and divinely ordained to have a homeland of their own,

at any cost. As the eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein said, "Pharisaism

became Talmudism, Talmudism became Rabinism", which became Judaism,

which became Zionism. Rabbi Adolph Moses States, "Among the

innumerable misfortunes which have befallen...the most fatal in its

consequences is the name _Judaism_...Worse still, the Jews themselves,

who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism..."

As you can see, the Khazars were _NOT_ and are not the Biblical

Hebrew Judaists, but _claimed_ to be so as time went on. This

reasoning gave them (Khazarian Zionists) eventual justification for

establishing "Israel"; but one must ask if the killing of men, women

and children or forcing over half a million Palestinian Arabs (and

Christians) out of there homes to create a state is the "will of God"?

This is the Khazarian mentality.

When the Khazarian empire broke up through the tenth and twelfth

centuries, they migrated to become the "Jewry" of eastern Europe

(Germany, Poland, Hungary) as well as the Jewry of southern Russia and

the "Pale of Settlement". This is an _EXTREMELY VITAL POINT_ to

remember and will be expounded upon in a subsequent article.

Jewish historian Benjamin Freedman states: "The so-called or

self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European

origin _MAKE UP AT LEAST 90 PERCENT OF THE WORLD'S TOTAL PRESENT

POPULATION OF SO-CALLED OR SELF-STYLED "JEWS."_

The modern Jewry (Khazars) that run "Israel" and make up most

eastern European and Russian Jews are the "_Ashkenazi_" Jews (as

opposed to Sephardic, Oriental or Ethiopian/black Jews). the word

"Ashkenazi" is derived from "_Ashkenaz". This goes back to the days

of Noah who had three sons, Japheth, Sem (Shem), and Ham. _UNDERSTAND

THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY_: we have all heard the term "anti-semite".

The derivation is from Noah's son Sem, hence "Semites" - all who are

descended from Sem; so presumable an "anti-Semite" is one who is

racist or prejudiced against a "Semite". Fine. but Noah's other son

named Japheth, had a son named Gomer, who had a son named _ASHKENAZ!_

The truth is that the "Ashkenazi Jews" _ARE NOT SEMITES_, but are

named after JAPHETH'S grandson, _Ashkenaz_. the people of Ashkenaz,

according to Biblical concordances, lived in the _area of the Black

and Caspian Seas!_. This is also an area populated by the Canaanites,

who descended from Noah's son Ham. The people of this area are _not_

_Semites_!.

You can see that the slur of "anti-semite" has no validity

whatsoever. It would be a _non-semite_ accusing another of being an

"anti-semite". It is illogical. In fact the _accuser_ is the anti-

semite in reality. I am not saying racism against Jews doesn't exist,

but the intended context of the "anti-semite" label is based on a

totally false premise. The term "anti-semite" was first used in 1880

for the purpose of spreading the idea that as Christ was a "Semite",

it was un-Christian to oppose the activities of the people (Semites)

through whom He came to us. this applies only to _Semites_.

You can see the pertinence of this information today. The

Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ who claim to be true Judeans but

aren't, are those such as the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and the

Warburgs of the international banking scene; the British Israeli

Zionists that make up the core of the Committee of 300 and Crown of

England; the Anti-Defamation League who, in concert with the _Metro_

organization (Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundation supported)

runs the IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve, and is implementing

administrative, social legislation (unconstitutional) through the

National Governors Association, Council of State Governments and the

United Nations; all run by the same faction of Khazarians! The

Khazarians/Ashkenazi/Zionists are in control of Israeli government,

international banking, and all the various national and world Jewish

Congresses and Committees. Just ask any _Sephardic_ Jew how much of a

role they play in governmental affairs. In Israel they are treated as

second-class citizens _by the Khazarian Ashkenazi Zionist Jews_!

A few personal notes here. Please don't misconstrue my

intentions with this article. I have no connection with any white

supremacist type organization or any such group of ignorant, foolish

racists and bigots. I am not implicating all, or even most, Jewish

people with this information. As a matter of fact, this information

is more for the millions of good and godly Jewish people in the world

than for anyone else. All Jewish people everywhere need to realize

_who stole the Judean's heritage and why_, because it is the true Jews

and the Godly Jews that have always been sacrificed at the alter of

the Khazarians. these few power-seeking bad apples spoil the whole

bunch and its time for the "true Jews" to see it and speak out. In

fact, many have. Such truthful men as the Jewish authors presented

above have tried to reveal the truth to people, as well as those such

as Rabbi Elmir Berger, Rabbi Louis Joel Teitelbaum and many other

Jewish scholars. Again _all_ the above information is from Jewish

historians and scholars.

In the above article we are talking about a _specific_ group of

evil men who are trying to control the world's wealth, minds and

ultimately, souls. The Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ leaders

are the anti-god/anti-Christ force of the world. The "adversary"

energy (by whatever name) must have physical beings to work through

and _they are it_. They are the destroyers and the testers of

humanity. They have done their job well, indeed. But the world they

have ensnared in their web of deceit and lies is now fully exposed.

They know the game is over, but will certainly fight to the very end.

So be it. Creator's troops of light and truth are here once again and

are now prevailing.

recall _Revelations_ 3:9; "To those who are of the synagogue of

Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not..."

KHAZARS!

METRO, IMF, WORLD BANK, CSG, BIS, IRS, U.N.,

FEDERAL RESERVE, GOVERNORS ASSOC., ONE WORLD ORDER

-------------------------

SOURCES;

1: The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler

2: The Garden of Aton, by Nora Boyles

3: A History of Russia, by Nicholas Rissanovsky

4: Facts are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman

5: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty

-----------------------------------------

CITIZEN'S PERSPECTIVE

Sept. 30, 1995

KHAZARS, COMMUNISM/BOLSHEVISM

By Rex Weeks

Please keep in mind with this series of articles on Khazarian self-

chosen Jews that there is no intent whatsoever to insult or denigrate

all Jews worldwide. The fact is that we are talking about a small,

specific faction of world-domination thinking "Jews" who have stolen

the Hebrew Judaists heritage and use it for their own gain. I honor

all Jewish seekers of truth who see this light because you are the

most affected by this evil ploy.

In the last article on the history of the Khazars of southern Russia,

we learned that this powerful warrior/merchant/pagan tribe became

"Jews" (Judahites) as a political decision in 740 A.D., according to

the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. They had, and still have, no

connection at all to the Biblical Hebrew Judaists. They had build a

despotic empire by brutal warfare and in part through their extraction

of a 10 percent "toll" (tax) on all traders passing through their

lands, with the penalty of death for those who would resist.

Around 862 A.D., a _Rus_, (or "Varangian" of Nordic/Viking origin)

leader from the north and west named Rurik founded the city of

Novgorod, and _Russia_ was born. Some of these "Russians" settled in

areas of Khazar territory and warfare ensued.

In 989 A.D., Russia's leader, Vladimir of Kiev, embraced Christianity,

as did the populace. Russia became a Christian nation and was so

until the Bolshevik Revolution. Lets see how that came about.

Around 1016, the Russian forces defeated the Khazars, and their

kingdom was finished. Many Khazarians, who now called themselves

"Jews", stayed in their old homeland area of southern Russia, but

others "migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia" (Universal Jewish

Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, pg 377). Many moved to the areas now known as

eastern Europe (Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, Germany). In 1240 in

Kiev, "The Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members

finding refuge in towns further west" (Univ Jewish Encyl.Vol VI pg

382). With the third partition of Poland in 1793, Russia acquired the

world's largest 'Jewish' (Khazarian) population, which would

eventually contribute to their downfall.

Understand the situation here. You have a Khazarian people who are

now self-chosen 'Jews' (not Biblical Judaists) following the

_Babylonian Talmud_, who were just conquered by a Christian Russian

people. The Judaized Khazars held deep ideological resentment against

their new Christian rulers which set the stage for future war against

the Russians. The Khazarians 'Jews' were determined not to be

Russianized or Christianized.

Under Christian Tsarist Russia, most Jews (Khazarians) were relegated

to a specific area of southern/western Russia called the "Pale of

Settlement". In 1897, the year of Russia's first census, 93.6 percent

of Russian Khazarian 'Jews' lived in the 'Pale'. It was in the Pale

period when many Jewish/Khazarian radicals fomented the plot to

finally overthrow their age old enemy, the Christian Russians, through

their movements of Zionism and Bolshevism! Feeling a possible

kinship, many were also students of Karl Marx, the Jewish

author/revolutionary. Eventually, every Russian 'Jew'/Khazarian came

to identify themselves with one of the three movements above.

In the early 1800's, Alexander II attempted to have the Jew/Khazars

assimilate into the Russian community. They were now permitted into

the universities and to hold professional and governmental positions.

While this provided opportunity for the law-abiding Jewish citizen, it

also opened the "Pandora's Box" of Jewish/Khazarians anti-government

radicals.

Tsar Alexander II lost considerable enthusiasm for the liberal

"Jewish" policy when an assassination attempt was made on his life in

1866. Another attempt was made again in 1879. Finally, in 1881, a

plot was hatched at the home of Hesia Helfman (Jewish/Khazar), and the

Tsar was killed.

Much unrest and rioting occurred thereafter. In 1882, the Russian

"May Laws" were passed in an attempt to stem the tide of both

Jewish/Khazarian exploitation of people and the anti-Jewish reaction

to this. Under Nicholas II there was no abatement of the regulations,

after the murder of Alexander II, to curb the anti-government

activities of the Jews; consequently, the "reaction to those excesses

was Jewish support of the Bolsheviks" (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,

Vol. I, pg. 286).

The Russian Empire was in social and economic turmoil. Desperate for

money, the Russian minister turned to the banking house of Rothchild

(Khazarian financier). Once the loans were made, Rothschild informed

them that unless the Jewish persecution stopped, no more money would

be forthcoming. This set the stage for even further unrest.

In 1900, the Jewish dominated Social Revolutionary Party was

responsible for the assassination of no less than six ranking members

of the Imperial government. It's chief was the Khazarian Jew,

Gershuni, along with Yevno Azev, son of a Jewish tailor.

"Bloody Sunday" marked the beginning of the 1905 Revolution. The

Jewish Khazarian Marxists were joined by the working class. This was

the real beginning of the Jewish dominated revolution in Russia. This

year also marked the return of Lenin from his Siberian exile.

Several political parties were formed in the subsequent years leading

up to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. There was the workers union, The

Jewish General Workers Union, or Bund, the Mensheviks, a predominantly

Jewish group, and the Bolsheviks. The leaders of these groups made up

the Petersburg _Soviet_, led by such Jews as Zborovski, Nosar and

Trotsky (real name Bronstein).

With the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the Khazarian Jewish/Marxists

of the Bolshevik/Communist Party had finally achieved the overthrow of

their Christian Russian rulers.

One of the first acts of the Provisional Government was to bring back

to Russia the political victims of the tsarist government who had

either fled or been exiled. Among the _ninety thousand_ exiles

(almost all professional revolutionaries) most were Jewish, with the

few exceptions. Returning to Russia were men such as Lenin (again),

Stalin, Kamenev, Martov, Radek (Sobelsohn, who was head of the Soviet

Russian Atheist Party), Sverdlov and others. These were _all_

Jewish/Khazarian radicals, including Lenin. The Petersburg Soviet was

initially Menshevik dominated but was soon taken over by the

Bolsheviks, who in 1918 changed their name to the _Communist Party_.

There power was consolidated by the merging of the Jewish Bund.

To see the Jewish/Khazarian influence in the Bolshevik takeover of

Russia, let's take a look at some statistics relating to the members

of the Communist organizations that formed the core of the Revolution.

Some of the following is from Robert Wilton, Russian correspondent of

_The Times_. The list of names of the Communist/Bolshevik/Khazarian

rulers of the Revolution are as follows:

The Central Committee of the Extraordinary Commission and

the Council of Commissars, of the 62 members; 5 Russians,

1 Ukrainian, 6 Letts, 2 Germans, 1 Czech, 2 Armenians,

3 Georgians, 1 Karaim (Jewish sect), 41 Jews.

The Extraordinary Commission of Moscow;

of 36 members; 1 German, 1 Pole, 1 Armenian, 2 Russians,

8 Letts, 23 Jews.

The Council of People's Commissars;

2 Armenians, 3 Russians, 17 Jews.

According to the _Soviet Press_, out of 556 important functionaries of

the _Bolshevik State_, including the above, there were in 1918-1919;

17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans,

1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Czech, 1 Karaim, and

457 JEWS.

The _Central Committee of the Bolshevik/Communist Party is as follows:

Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Loured (Larine),

Ourtitski, Volodarski, Rosenfeldt (Kamenev), Smidovitch,

Sverdlof (Yankel), Nakhamkes (Steklof), Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko,

Lounatcharski. All but the last two are Jews.

The Central Committee of the _Menshevils_; 11 members, all Jews.

Communists of the People, 6 members, 1 Russian, 5 Jews.

S.R. (Right Wing), 15 members, 2 Russians, 13 Jews.

S.R. (Left Wing), 12 members, 2 Russians, 10 Jews.

Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow, 5 members, 1 Russian, 4 Jews.

Polish Communist Party, 12 members, all Jews.

Here is another breakdown of the ruling Bolshevik/Communist/Khazarians

who ran the Revolution:

Name (Real Name) Nationality

Lenin Ulyanov Rus/Jewish

Trotsky Bronstein Jewish

Martoff Zederbaum Jewish

Zinoviev Apfelbaum Jewish

Steckloff Nakhames Jewish

Kamenov Rosenfeld(t) Jewish

Dan Gourevitch Jewish

Ganetzky Furstenberg Jewish

Parvus Helpfand Jewish

Uritzky Padonilsky Jewish

Larin Lurge Jewish

Bohrin Nathansohn Jewish

Martinoff Zibar Jewish

Bogdanoff Zilberstein Jewish

Garin Garfeld Jewish

Suchanoff Gimel Jewish

Kamnelff Goldman Jewish

Sagersky Krochmann Jewish

Riazanoff Goldenbach Jewish

Solutezeff Bleichmann Jewish

Piatnitzky Ziwin Jewish

Axelrod Orthodox Jewish

Glasnuoff Schultze Jewish

Zuriesain Weinstein Jewish

Lapinsky Loewensohn Jewish

After Reading the above, there can be no question at to the role of

the Khazarian Jewish Communists in the Bolshevik Revolution which

overthrew Christian Russia.

"Individual revolutionary leaders of Jewish origin - such as

Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamemev, and Sverdlov - played a conspicuous part

in the revolution of November, 1917. which enabled the Bolshevists to

take possession of the state apparatus" - Universal Jewish

Encyclopedia, Vol IX, pg. 668

The Jewish writer, M. Cohen in an article published in _The Communist_

(a Soviet paper), wrote: "The Great Russian revolution was indeed

accomplished by the hands of the Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks

of the red Army as far as _privates_ are concerned, but in the

Committees (Soviet), and the Soviet organization as Commissars, the

Jews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol of Jewry has become

the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen in the fact

of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former times was

the symbol of Zionism and Jewry."

The battle in Russia then, and _now_, is an age old conflict between

the Khazarian Communist Ashkenazi Bolshevik "Jew" and the Christian

Russia. The battle wages on today.

The ramifications of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia were dire.

Estimates are that anywhere from 30 to 80 million Christians (60

million according to Soltzchenytsin) were killed at the hands of the

atheistic Khazarian Communist Bolshevik "Jews". This included

millions of Jews themselves who were sacrificed at the Khazarian alter

of blood. This Christian Holocaust is one you never hear of and is

one of the most horrific in history. The Khazarians will not hesitate

to sacrifice even their "own" (or especially true Jews).

to understand the treason and treachery of the Khazarian Communist

Zionist, you need to see how they aided and abetted the Russian

Revolution (and Nazi Germany) through financial support.

During the Bolshevik Revolution, the Khazarian Jewish banker, Jacob

Schiff (who helped establish the Federal Reserve) helped to send

Trotsky to Russia with a support of $20 million dollars!

As evidence of Jacob Schiff's "settlement in Russia" effort, we have

the following letter from the _German Imperial Bank of Stockholm_;

"Dear Comrade; In conformity with a telegram from the Westphalian

Rhineland Syndicate, Max Warburg & Co.'s Bank informs you that an

account is opened to Comrade _Trotsky's_ enterprise. I. Furstenburg."

At the time, the Jewish bankers, the Warburgs (Max, Felix and Paul)

were co-directors with Jacob Schiff of the New York Banking House

of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. The _American Civil Servant Document_ 65th

Congress, 3rd Session, contains the following:

"It was found that the following persons, as well as the banking

house mentioned, were engaged in these work of destruction (meaning

the subsidizing of Russian revolutionaries); Jacob Schiff, Guggenheim,

Max Breitung, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer

Schiff, and S.J. Hanauer." (all Khazarians).

This was also evidenced in Nazi Germany where Khazarian Ashkenazi

(Jewish power brokers were involved in financial dealings with the

Germans. Rockefeller of Standard Oil (in conjunction with I.G.

Farben) supplied Germany before and during the war. I.G. Farben in

fact had plants ( 'buna' rubber) inside some of the concentration/

labor camps. I.G. Farben had over a half dozen Jews (Ashkenazi) on

their board.

At the Nuremburg Trials, evidence was given connecting the Warburg

banking house with Hitler. The following testimony was given by the

widow of General Ludendorff:

"As early as the summer of 1929, James P. Warburg had undertaken

and assignment from financial circles in America which desired to

exercise solitary influence on Germany in the unleashing of a national

revolution. Warburg's task was to find the suitable man in Germany

(Hitler), who subsequently received sums of money amounting to 27

million dollars up to January 30, 1933, and still another seven

million thereafter, enabling him to finance his movement."

The London Jewish Chronicle of Jan. 6, 1933 reported, "Over one-third

of the Jews in Russia have become officials."

The "Jewish" nature of the Bolshevik Revolution was not lost on some

international leaders. That the Revolution was plotted, organized,

financed and managed by "Jews" (Khazarians) was further revealed by

Winston Churchill in the following statement:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation

of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian

Revolution by these international atheistic Jews. The Majority of the

leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and

driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. In the Soviet

institutions the prominence of Jews is even more astonishing..."

Churchill again, in the "_Sunday Herald_" of 8-2-20 wrote;

"I deal here with the schemes of the International Jew...This

movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-

Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun

(Hungary), Rosa Luxemberg (Germany), Emma Goldman (U.S.A.), this

world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization, and for the

re-construction of society on the basis of arrested development, of

envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily

growing."

Further confirmation is given by the "_The American Hebrew_" as

follows:

"The Bolshevist Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish

brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning whose goal is to

create a _new order_ in the world. What was performed in so excellent

a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish

dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same

Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the

world."

This brief history of Russia should awaken people, most especially all

good Jews, to the danger of the Khazarian Communist Zionist "Jews" in

our midst. They are the "One World Order" right from the Crown of

England, the British Israeli Zionists/Committee of 300, international

bankers, "Metro/1313", Federal Reserve, U.N., 'state' of Israel, and

British Intelligence (CIA, ADL, MI-6, etc.) ALL interconnected and

_planned_ organizations, the common denominator being the _KHAZARIANS_

regardless of agency or country.

I state before the eyes of God that I have true love and respect for

the millions of good Jewish people of the world and for their

contributions to humanity. But I have no respect for the evil, anti-

Christ Khazarian Communist Zionist "false Jewish" elite who have

stolen the heritage of the true Jews and use it to foment the control

and destruction of our freedom; even our souls, should we allow it.

It is up to those good and Godly Jews to reveal this truth to the

world, and you will find the world will stand with you.

References:

1: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty.

2: Behind Communism, by Frank Britton.

3: Three Who Made a Revolution, by Bertram D. Wolfe.

4: Universal Jewish Dictionary

5: Universal Jewish Encyclopedias

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Jewish Defector Warns America:

Benjamin Freedman Speaks

by Benjamin H. Freedman

Introductory Note

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing

individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a

successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time

the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with

organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent

the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his

considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the

Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman

knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the

highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to

gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted

with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin

Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers

and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic

audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf

of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech

has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his

warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists

have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many

and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their

co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the

absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very

broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all

asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are

few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on

one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side

by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally,

but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to

the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with

one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time,

the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of

French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army

was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they

didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the

Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had

crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering

England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what

the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call

the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started."

England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously.

They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace

that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the

war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the

Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and --

I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the

documents to prove any statement that I make --they said: "Look here.

You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have

to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can

win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The

United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were

young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will

guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to

fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after

you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get

the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay

is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany,

Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to

promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to

promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely

absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any

interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it

as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United

States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October

of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here

remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-

German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because

the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews,

all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled

by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German

because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to

see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they

didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like

Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States

refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar.

They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are

tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into

Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick

the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting

Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time,

everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to

green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd

been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having

fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a

sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns.

They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies'

hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared

war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to

Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're

getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President

Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United

States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no

more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead

of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to

be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were

suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world

could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the

United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into

World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and

they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have

something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your

bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't

know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So

they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a

letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world

at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the

Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the

Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the

United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that

you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I

don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the

war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When

the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace

Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation

representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought

to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when

they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these

nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory,

said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first

time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So

the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game!

That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the

first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the

terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the

Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans

realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews

had never been better off in any country in the world than they had

been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times

as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this

country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines,

the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.

Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had

the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the

biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No

question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a

sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical

situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet

Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well,

let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing."

And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the

Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about

our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which

man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat,

if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese

citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working

with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was

through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How

would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't

think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There

wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine

how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so

nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in

Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all

went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated

very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no

reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-

called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you

read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921,

1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled

with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany

is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was

brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States

into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the

Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better

than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling.

There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of

their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was

anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went

home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our

Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United

States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to

one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing

defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for

which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of

being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world

trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French

Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities,

dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political

entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon

and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50

years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was

rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the

world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products.

What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap

down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a

valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off

the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,

they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew

was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown

University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State

Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department

document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to

Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political

prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.

They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they

were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because

the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in

Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and

ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had

international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over

Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a

group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact,

when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought

the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and

that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to

Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in

Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back

into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way

they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They

fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists

fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one

another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the

Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90

million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of

one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they

controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy

because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued

and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world

to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the

Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I

say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned

them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or

the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an

enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.

Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July

1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every

Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no

matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of

the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what

the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of

Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer,

who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the

whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer

to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio

broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,

"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are

now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are

going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide

boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are

dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two

thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only

be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany

could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to

starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the

population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was

printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer

boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-

defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National

Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where

everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down

by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the

Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world

declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you

couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the

words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth

Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of

crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted

if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they

were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth,

something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a

store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a

family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found

stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany."

Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20

years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's

been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw

Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs

saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time,

not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There

was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there

was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a

boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our

industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?"

They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on

stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to

a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve

Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to

dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was

ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a

young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and

shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough

with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows

and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's

meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use

it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against

Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this

world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World

War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely

necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see

which one was going to survive.

In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans

had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there

is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it

Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm.

In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The

Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that

"Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as

we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come

soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84

billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against

40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in

their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the

world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from

which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my

imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of

megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of

TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million

tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs

that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God

knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into

a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place?

It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World

War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III.

The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists

everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the

United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their

foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am

standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read

it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your

boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it

any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a

deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.

Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew

it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson

knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was

liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President

Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was

"confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the

finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the

treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the

head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into

President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become

the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the

Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as

close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was

just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as

a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we

all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what?

So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've

fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or

going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness

who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his

testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York

state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told

one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because

they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to

them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern

European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of

those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They

were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they

were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into

eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square

miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European

countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -

- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to

war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and

powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to

go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it

was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere

in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy

of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic

faith --either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as

Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling

out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And

that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools

of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened

up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.

There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in

the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the

beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the

Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in

Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People

to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your

Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.

You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew,

and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just

the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call

them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million

Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since

then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious

belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from

Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese

decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics.

Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be

crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that

had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the

Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported

to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a

different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted

Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were

a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.

Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the

matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic,

everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.

So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly

it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're

going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People

to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a

bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the

magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business,

and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians

on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising

that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard

it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd

start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all

the misery that has befallen the world. Do you know what Jews do on

the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one

of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.

I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk

into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you

recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three

times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter

into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge

that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and

void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the

pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect.

And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow,

or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited

on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their

loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are

going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same

reason.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following is an article from the June 13, 1996 edition of The Wanderer

that cries for wide distribution.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In Our Hands"

by Joseph Sobran

One isn't supposed to say this, but many people believe that Israel

now holds the White House, the Senate, and much of the American

media in its hands. This is what is known as an anti-Semitic

conspiracy theory.

The odd thing is that it is held by many Israelis. In an essay

reprinted in the May 27th issue of The New York Times, Ari Shavit,

an Israeli columnist, reflected sorrowfully on the wanton Israeli

killing of more than 100 Lebanese civilians in April: "We killed them

out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude

that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American

media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our

own..."

In a single phrase -- "in our hands" -- Shavit has lighted up the

American political landscape like a flash of lightning.

Notice that Shavit assumes as an obvious fact what we Americans can

say publicly only at our own risk. It's surprising, and refreshing,

to find such candor in an American newspaper (though his essay was

reprinted from the Israeli paper Haaretz).

The prescribed cant on the subject holds that Israel is a "reliable

ally" of the United States, despite Israel's long record of

double-dealing against this country, ranging from the killing of

American sailors to constant espionage and technology theft. The

word "ally" implies that the relationship exists because it's in the

interests of this country, though Israel's lobby is clearly devoted

to the interests of Israel itself, and it's childish to suggest

otherwise.

You expect that from the Israeli lobby; lobbies are lobbies, after

all. But it's unnerving that the White House, the Senate, and much

of the American media should be "in our hands," as Shavit puts it.

Bill Clinton, a lover of peace since his college days, raised no

protest when the Israelis drove 400,000 innocent Lebanese out of

their homes in "retaliation" for rockets launched into Israel

(wounding one Israeli) by a faction over whom those 400,000 had no

control.

Congress, of course, was supine as usual at this latest extravagance

of Israeli "defense." Congress too is "in our hands."

A recent article in The Washington Post likened the Israel lobby's

power to that of the gun and tobacco lobbies. But there is one

enormous difference. Newspapers like the Post aren't afraid to

criticize the gun and tobacco lobbies. They will say forthrightly

that those lobbies seek goals that are dangerous for this country.

They don't dare say as much of the Israeli lobby.

But much of the press and electronic media are "in our hands" in a

more active sense: They supply misleading pro-Israel propaganda in

the guise of news and commentary, constantly praising Israeli

"democracy" and ignoring Israel's mistreatment of its non-Jewish

minorities -- mistreatment which, if any government inflicted it on

a Jewish minority, would earn it the fierce opprobrium of our media.

No decent American would think of reducing American Jews to the status

of Palestinians in Israel. The idea is almost absurd. Yet Americans

are taxed to subsidize the oppression of Palestinians, on the flimsy

pretext that they are helping an "ally" in America's own

self-interest to be hated and despised by the whole Muslim world.

All this is interesting less for what it tells us about Israel than

for what it tells us about America. Frank discussion of Israel is

permitted in Israel, as Shavit's article illustrates. It's rarely

permitted here. Charges of anti-Semitism and a quiet but very

effective boycott will be the reward of any journalist who calls

attention to his own government's -- and his own profession's --

servitude to Israeli interests.

Very few in America are doing anything to change this sorry state of

affairs. Shavit wrote his article in the desperate hope of turning

back his countrymen and his government from a morally and

politically perilous course. At least he can hope. It's harder for

us, when our own government isn't in our hands.

=========end==============

"All truth passes through 3 stages. First, it is ridiculed.

Second, it is violently opposed.

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

--- Arthur Schopenhauer

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Southwest Reporter

Special Edition Sept. 30, 1995

Why Chicago as the Center for Metro and the

New World Order Treasonists?

By David A. Newby & "Grandma"

As this mystery unravels we have found more that has been hidden from

us. A very dear friend and fellow researcher asked a relevant

question in reference to this Metro mess, "Why Chicago"? This is a

very pertinent question and what the attendant research revealed will

be just one more shock upon those already revealed.

Grandma and I have to do our work by phone and fax. We don't have the

luxury of having the same books to work from in most cases and this

slows down this process of divination of the mystery. She has copies

of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found that under the

original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the Virginia

and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut

and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter.

Quoting the 11th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911:

"In the year 1670 Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert

and seventeen other noblemen and gentlemen, incorporation them

as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of England trading

into Hudson's Bay,' securing to them the 'sole trade and

commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks

and streams in whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within

the entrance of the straits commonly called Hudson's Straits,

together with all lands and territories upon the countries,

coasts and islands of the seas, bays, &c., aforesaid, that are

not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our

subjects, or possessed by the subjects of any other Christian

prince or state."

With this broad grant of latitude of all the waterways it should be

pretty obvious that the Charter included all of the Great Lakes. But

aside from all of this granting of land by the King, the Charter was

also granted the whole right to travel for trade to and from the bays

and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the Charter

has heavy relevance later in this article.

In 1842 a Convention was concluded with England establishing the

northern border of the United States at the 49th parallel. In

studying these treaties and the laws you must always look at the words

because they always have a relevance. Citing the Convention as to

boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of 1842

Article IV states:

"All grants of land heretofore made by either party, within the

limits of the territory which by this treaty falls within the

dominions of the other party, shall by held valid, ratified and

confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant..."

This section states that any property rights would be honored. In

1863 there was a "Treaty for Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay

Company, etc." Article I states in part:

"...it was stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation

of the territory south of the 49th parallel of the north

latitude, as provided in the first article of the said treaty,

(1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should

by respected."

The verbiage is identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of

the rockies and similar to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all

of this in these two treaties is that Chicago was a fort or outpost of

the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and most definitely by 1863

Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption that the

Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings

in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties

are there.

Remember that the original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company

control over all trade and travel to and from the "waters". Chicago

today is a free port under maritime. With control of the travel and

trade granted in the original charter, it most probably means that the

Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the railroads, ports and roads in

Chicago and probably does so to this day. The Hudson's Bay Company

was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that Chicago, at

least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American soil

and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown!

That's "Why Chicago"!

When one is into researching this type of data you never know what

you may find. While digging through the books I found the

Proclamation of 1763 in the Documents of American History. Within

this Proclamation we see the King of England establishing four new

governments, one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in West Florida

and one in Grenada.

All of this got us to thinking. Why is the King of England setting up

government in these obviously French and Spanish territories? We

discovered that France and Spain had fought a war against England and

concluded it with a treaty in Paris in February of 1763. The

Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year. We

determined that these aforementioned territories falling under British

control shows that they were "prizes of war" and taken under treaty.

The relevance of all of this comes to light when you look at the fact

that we supposedly bought the "Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How

could we buy the Floridas from Spain if Spain gave them to England as

war prizes?

The question led us to the Treaty of Friendship of 1795. Within the

treaties of Spain at that time the King of Spain was always referred

to as His Catholic Majesty. But within the document of 1795 we find a

reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference and not an oversight.

Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states:

"And if on any account it should be found necessary that the said

Commissioners and Surveyors should be accompanied by guards, they

shall be furnished in equal proportions by the commanding officer

of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..."

As it appears from the distinction between His Catholic Majesty and

His Majesty, there were British occupying forces in the Floridas.

Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario: The King of England took

over the territories of the Floridas. The King of Spain had subjects

in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere. the King

of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights

to the cities, i.e. the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the

United States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas it only

bought the Spanish cities.

When you read the treaty of 1819 where the deal was made "His Majesty"

appears again. From the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had

to petition "His Majesty's foreign minister" to get permission to make

the sale. The British control of the Floridas also helps explain why

Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans"

during the war of 1812... the British had a vested land interest!

Grandma states that the British troops were probably expelled, if they

were not already gone, by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though

there was no physical occupation by the British, the Crown still

maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This could explain why

Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program started. It

also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil

War, they were part owners!

Another point that must be considered is that as well educated as the

generation of the Founders was, they must have known of the British

ownership of the Floridas. Something of that magnitude could not be

reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that there may

possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States

government and the Crown.

Not of us was ever taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this

all into question. I am of the firm conviction nowadays that anything

that is hidden in hidden for a reason.

We've proven, through treaties and charters that the Hudson's Bay

Company owned Chicago and the travel and tread thereto which includes

more than likely the Chicago Transit Authority, the Port Authority,

the municipal water works, power and telecommunications companies, and

the railroads.

Notice on the list of CSG Associates how many public utilities and

public transpiration companies are affiliated. The following will

establish the ADL aspect or the Khazarian connection. Citing from

EIR's book, Dope, Inc.:

"The probe turned up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with

Jewish gangsters, from Meyer Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor

Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary Dope, Inc. figures such as

Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam Riklis, and the

ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for the

Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also

discovered that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from

leading families of Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes

trace back to the British banks and trading companies that ran the

opium clipper ships in and out of China in the last century."

Take note of the name Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia

during the Kennedy administration. Lansky had definitive connections

in Miami which still serves as a major point of ingress to this

country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General Janet Reno

comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up

all manner of corruption in the book Votescam and by other individuals

who worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she

was picked as USAG specifically because of her probably ties directly

into Metro.

The Khazarian Bronfman family owns the Seagrams empire which you will

note is a corporate associate of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking

interests include J.P. Morgan & Associates. Per the citing from Dope,

Inc. these selfsame organizations serve as contributors to the ADL.

The Great Chicago fire occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of

Claims with the Hudson's Bay Company back to the Crown. One of the

prime methods of deleting land titles and records is by fire. You

will find great numbers of burned houses of records in Peru,

Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South during the Civil

War in order to expunge deeds as well as the original 13th Amendment.

Franklin Roosevelt once said that in politics there are no

coincidences. It is too coincidental that two years after the Crown

took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay Company the city of

Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it would be to

destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in America.

Grolier's National Encyclopedia states:

"The Great Fire destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000,

which did not destroy the hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in

two years..."

That means about $1 million per acre! We've done some figuring on

just where that $178 million came from and this is what we came up

with. Of Course, this is speculation based on certain real factors.

In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we discussed the

Gold Railroad bonds issued during the Grant administration that made

certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted.

These bonds totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance

policy (Tontine) on someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied

by about 1,500 deaths and that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on

property loss runs about $100 million what with residential and

commercial property, railroads, grainaries and cattle yards. That

leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that the banks

that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks which made up

the other $11 million which caused reverberations throughout the

nation causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of

this:

Railroad bonds........................ $62 million

Property loss and death insurance.....$100 million

Bank loans called in...................$11 million

------------------

Total............$173 million

Which would leave $5 million to be balanced between the property

damage, loss of life and the bank note calls equaling the $178 million

required to rebuild. It is our contention that most of this money

came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds in order to

build a new "capitol" city in America from which to launch the New

World Order through the Agent called Metro.

"In 1890, Lake Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received

Chicago's sewage...the Chicago River, when the canal was brought

in, reversed its course to flow into the Mississippi..."

- (Groliers - 1939)

With the Settlement of the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863 giving the

lawful possessors of land control of the lands adjoining the water;

with the burning of all titles and deeds to prove ownership being

burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what a wonderful

opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the Hudson's Bay

Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the claims

probably lost in court as they could not produce their deeds or titles

due to the fire. do you see how neat it is? And on top of that it is

a possibility that the assets of the major people involved had been

spirited away and stored before "Mrs. O'leary's cow" started the fire.

Could the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance

scam and power play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself?

The record of provable deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so

we don't think this is beyond the realm of possibility. Especially

when they modus operandi is the same, only on a larger scale.

Throughout this series we have laid out substantial proof of our

assertions, which, upon investigation will prove out the charges

levied of sedition, fraud, theft and treason. The United States

government, in concert with the British/Zionist/Communist controlled

Metro organizations and it's Governors' Conference of the fifty State

Governors has worked continuously to destroy this nation.

Even if we are incorrect in our assessment and potential reasons for

the Great Fire of 1871, (and we don't think we are), there is still

more than enough evidence to convict these traitors in any court of

true justice.

In 1908 the Council of Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress

in reference to Conservation. This 1908 Declaration reads very

similar to the RAMSAR, and Bio-diversity treaty currently put forth

through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately tied into

Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress.

The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors

Declaration on Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE

CONTROL" of the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as

well as for soil and forest conservation. Sounds just like the

enviromentalist's "green" agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that

that is exactly what it is.

It appears that anywhere between 20-40 years before these treaties,

declarations and laws are to take effect, by the 99 years rule under

the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create groups to push for the

acceptance of the already decided change. That figures out to be 1-2

generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the

propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance.

Look at how hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance

through the cartoons your children watch and the commercials being

aired on recycling. We are all being herded like cattle into the new

Metro-ized society of the New World Order of British-Israel.

We all know that the flooding of the Midwest in the last two to three

yours is unnatural. Is it possible that these floods are not

accidental? With the rerouting and reversing of the Chicago River and

it dumping into the Mississippi the backwash would not be evident at

the headwaters but would flood downstream. does the connection to the

Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a broadened

area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded

out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who

profits?

These articles are supposed to make you think and maybe do something

to save your country and yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all

for you. You have to help expose the lie, and many of you are.

In the last article we showed how the Federal Reserve came into being

in 1913, but forgot to mention that two other British controlled

organizations came into this country as well, the American Bar

Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through the

research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others it has been

revealed that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British

Intelligence arm MI-6 and is a spying and propaganda organization here

to do nothing but to promote the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism.

The Intimate ties are there between the Khazarian elite and the royal

heads of Europe and have been intertwined for centuries. This nation

has stood as a bar to worldwide feudalism for the last two centuries,

but the efforts by these same entities to destroy this nation and her

people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of attention, de-education

and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some blame lies with

Metro et al., the rest lies with us.

Sources:

Documents of American History - Commager

U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts,

Protocols and Agreements.

Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911

Dope, Inc. EIR

Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed.

(begin notice)

=========================================================================

NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS:

The owners and users of this system are exercising First Amendment

rights.

Some material on this system is in preparation for public

dissemination and is "work product material" protected under The First

Amendment Privacy Protection Act of 1980 (USC 42, Section 2000aa).

Note that this is a civil statute. Violation of this statute by law

enforcement agents is very likely to result in a civil suit as

provided under Section 2000aa-6. Each and every person who has such

"work product material" stored on this system is entitled to recover

at least minimum damages of $1000 *plus all legal expenses.* Agents

in some states may not be protected from *personal* civil liability if

they violate this statute.

In addition, there is email, i.e., "stored electronic communications"

as defined by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) which

has been in storage less than 180 days on this system. Such stored

electronic communications are protected by the ECPA from seizure or

"preventing authorized access" without warrants specific to each

person's email. Seizing the computer where this BBS resides would

prevent such authorize access. There are civil actions which may be

taken against law enforcement agents under provisions of the Act. You

can find them in USC 18, Section 2704. On this system you can expect

up to 200 people to have stored email. Each of them is entitled to

collect a minimum of $1000 *plus all legal expenses* for violations of

Section 2700 and 2703.

While the agency you work for *might* pay your legal fees and

judgments against you, why take chances? If you feel the need to go

after email, or take actions which would deny email access to our

users (such as seizing our hardware), get appropriate warrants.

In addition, it is a violation of the Arizona Revised Statutes, to

gain access to this (or any) Computer Bulletin Board System, by

supplying false information to the Sysop, and you can be criminally

charged with wire fraud.

It is the policy of the sysop of this system to cooperate with law

enforcement agents--though we will not be involved in entrapments.

It is our utmost concern to protect the rights and privacies of all

of the Members of this BBS.

Please bring it to my attention if you discover illegal activities on

this board.

====================================================================

(end notice)