Download link: http://www.ichooseliberty.org/files/Semitism zionism report.doc
KHAZARS; AND THE INVALIDITY OF THE TERM 'ANTI-SEMITISM'
By Rex Weeks
NOTE: For those of you reading the information on the METRO
organization, you will need to understand the following history to
grasp the big picture.
You may have noticed the term "Khazar" or "Khazarian Zionists"
popping up more frequently in articles. Many of you know who and what
this term refers to (especially CONTACT readers), but for those who
don't, you are about to get a short lesson in history which is most
pertinent to events that have led up to the "One World Order".
The following information is from several Jewish historians,
scholars, and encyclopedic sources. Because of the direct connection
with "Khazars" and Jewish people today, I feel it is important to use
Jewish sources for this information. To understand past and present
world political events, we need to understand this history.
The kingdom of the Khazars may have vanished from the maps of
today, but their affect and influence are still acutely felt. In the
fist millennia A.D. a warlike, pagan tribe of people were driven
westward from Central Asia (see Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky).
They settled in an area of what is now Southern Russia between the
Black and Caspian Seas. This was an area just beyond the boundaries
of both the Roman and Byzantine Empires. These people were called
_Khazars_ (or Chazars) and were a tribe of Mongol, Turkish and Nordic
bloodlines. Throughout the centuries, this warring tribe became the
most powerful in Asia. As early as 3 A.D. they were indentifiable in
constant warfare in Persia and Armenia. They fought alongside Attila
the Hun around 5 A.D. They were at the peak of power between the
seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
The Khazars were strategically situated at the mouth of the Volga
River, surrounded by the Caucasus mountains to the south, the Black
Sea to the west, and the Khazar Sea (now Caspian Sea) to the east.
They occupied a strategic key position in the vital gateway between
the Seas where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each
other (The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler, Jewish historian).
Khazars were not only expert warriors, but aggressive merchants. At
the peak of their power, they exacted a "tribute" (tax, extortion) of
10 percent from all traders who had to pass through their dominion.
This made them a wealthy, but despised nation. By the eighth century,
their kingdom extended as far north as Kiev, Russia. At its peak, it
encompassed one million square miles. for three of four centuries it
was an untouchable empire. How many of you have ever heard of the
In the eighth century (740 A.D.) something of _historic
profoundness_ occurred in this kingdom. the Khazarian king
(Kagan/Khan, Khakan or Chagan), having no religion for the kingdom
beyond pagan phallic/idolatry worship, was getting pressure from the
surrounding Christian Byzantine and Moslem empires to convert.
According to the _Universal Jewish Encyclopedia_, the Khazar chieftain
Bulan, "called representatives of Judaism, Christianity, and
Mohammedism to expound their doctrines before him". Not wanting to
associate himself with either side, so as not to incur the wrath
(hence, a potential alliance of war) against them, King Bulan _chose
as the nations religion, Talmudism_, now known as JUDAISM (and
formally known as Pharisaism). It was now a state religion. ("Facts
are Facts", by Benjamin Freedman, Jewish author and historian in a
letter to Dr. David Goldstein). From the king's conversion to
"Judaism" (we'll use the current vernacular), it was spread to the
subjects of the land, especially by one of Bulan's successors,
Obadiah. By the tenth century the ruler of Christian Russia, Vladimir
III had conquered the Khazarian empire. but this is not the end of
the story. In fact, it is only the beginning.
Before going on, reflect on what happened here. Purely as a
political decision, the Khazar kingdom became Jews en masse (although
remember, the term "Jew" did not exist at that time; Khazaria was
called, "Land of the Judahites"). As Jewish historian Benjamin
Freedman put it, "The converted Khazars were the first population of
so called or self-styled (terms from the _Jewish Encyclopedia_) "Jews"
in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled "Jews" in eastern Europe
after the conversion of the conversion of the Khazars _are the
descendants of the Khazars converted to "Talmudism", or as it is now
known "Judaism", by the 7th century mass conversion of the Khazar
population_", end quote.
Are you beginning to grasp the historical significance of the
conversion to Talmudism/Judaism by the Khazars? These historians have
determined that the "Jews" of southern Russia and eastern Europe are
the Khazarian descendants of self-chosen converts, _having nothing to
do with Biblical Hebrews yet laying claim to their heritage. Ponder
on this a moment. For further reference, let's take a quote from the
_Jewish Encyclopedia_, Vol. IV, pages 1-5 on "Chazars" (pronounced
like cos(tume)Czar. From the _Jewish Encyclopedia_: quoting:
"Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are
interwoven with _THE VERY BEGINNINGS OF THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN
RUSSIA_... driven on by nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own
desire for plunder and revenge...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly
established in _most of south Russia long before the foundation of the
Russian monarchy by the Varangians_ (Russians)...The Kingdom of the
chazars was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the
chagan (king) of the Chazars _TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS
HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION_...The Jewish population
in the entire domain of the chazars, in the period between the seventh
and tenth centuries, _must have been considerable_...about the ninth
century, _IT APPEARS AS IF ALL THE CHAZARS WERE JEWS AND THAT THEY HAD
BEEN CONVERTED TO JUDASM ONLY A SHORT TIME BEFORE_...the people were
instructed in the Bible, Mishnah and the _TALMUD_...In their writings
the _Chazars used Hebrew letters_ (applied to the phonetics of Asiatic
dialects)... The Russian varangians established themselves at Kiev..
.until the final conquest of the chazars by the Russians...Many
members of the chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain...Some went
to Hungary, _BUT THE GREAT MASS OF THE PEOPLE REMAINED IN THEIR NATIVE
COUNTRY." (end quote).
Jewish historian, Professor H. Graetz, points out in his famous
"_History of the Jews_" that when other so called or self-styled
"Jews" in other countries heard about the Jewish Khazar kingdom, they
mistakenly believed the Khazars were one of the "lost ten tribes". As
you can see from the history above, this is the furthest thing from
the truth, hence the name of Arthur Koestler's book, "The _Thirteenth_
Tribe" (indicating they were not one of the original 12 tribes of
The Khazars took the Hebrew characters they say in the Babylonian
Talmud and applied them to the phonetics of the German, Russian,
Turkish and other dialects around them. This hybrid language was
known as _Yiddish_. Even with the disbandment of the Khazars, their
language of Yiddish survived and still today forms a common bond
between the people.
After their conquering, the Khazars of southern Russia stayed in
the area for the most part, spreading to the areas now known as
eastern Europe - Poland, Germany, Hungary - and made up the eastern
European "Jewry". From generation to generation they also passed down
a militant tradition known as _ZIONISM_ - the belief that they were a
chosen people and divinely ordained to have a homeland of their own,
at any cost. As the eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein said, "Pharisaism
became Talmudism, Talmudism became Rabinism", which became Judaism,
which became Zionism. Rabbi Adolph Moses States, "Among the
innumerable misfortunes which have befallen...the most fatal in its
consequences is the name _Judaism_...Worse still, the Jews themselves,
who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism..."
As you can see, the Khazars were _NOT_ and are not the Biblical
Hebrew Judaists, but _claimed_ to be so as time went on. This
reasoning gave them (Khazarian Zionists) eventual justification for
establishing "Israel"; but one must ask if the killing of men, women
and children or forcing over half a million Palestinian Arabs (and
Christians) out of there homes to create a state is the "will of God"?
This is the Khazarian mentality.
When the Khazarian empire broke up through the tenth and twelfth
centuries, they migrated to become the "Jewry" of eastern Europe
(Germany, Poland, Hungary) as well as the Jewry of southern Russia and
the "Pale of Settlement". This is an _EXTREMELY VITAL POINT_ to
remember and will be expounded upon in a subsequent article.
Jewish historian Benjamin Freedman states: "The so-called or
self-styled "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European
origin _MAKE UP AT LEAST 90 PERCENT OF THE WORLD'S TOTAL PRESENT
POPULATION OF SO-CALLED OR SELF-STYLED "JEWS."_
The modern Jewry (Khazars) that run "Israel" and make up most
eastern European and Russian Jews are the "_Ashkenazi_" Jews (as
opposed to Sephardic, Oriental or Ethiopian/black Jews). the word
"Ashkenazi" is derived from "_Ashkenaz". This goes back to the days
of Noah who had three sons, Japheth, Sem (Shem), and Ham. _UNDERSTAND
THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY_: we have all heard the term "anti-semite".
The derivation is from Noah's son Sem, hence "Semites" - all who are
descended from Sem; so presumable an "anti-Semite" is one who is
racist or prejudiced against a "Semite". Fine. but Noah's other son
named Japheth, had a son named Gomer, who had a son named _ASHKENAZ!_
The truth is that the "Ashkenazi Jews" _ARE NOT SEMITES_, but are
named after JAPHETH'S grandson, _Ashkenaz_. the people of Ashkenaz,
according to Biblical concordances, lived in the _area of the Black
and Caspian Seas!_. This is also an area populated by the Canaanites,
who descended from Noah's son Ham. The people of this area are _not_
You can see that the slur of "anti-semite" has no validity
whatsoever. It would be a _non-semite_ accusing another of being an
"anti-semite". It is illogical. In fact the _accuser_ is the anti-
semite in reality. I am not saying racism against Jews doesn't exist,
but the intended context of the "anti-semite" label is based on a
totally false premise. The term "anti-semite" was first used in 1880
for the purpose of spreading the idea that as Christ was a "Semite",
it was un-Christian to oppose the activities of the people (Semites)
through whom He came to us. this applies only to _Semites_.
You can see the pertinence of this information today. The
Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ who claim to be true Judeans but
aren't, are those such as the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and the
Warburgs of the international banking scene; the British Israeli
Zionists that make up the core of the Committee of 300 and Crown of
England; the Anti-Defamation League who, in concert with the _Metro_
organization (Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundation supported)
runs the IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve, and is implementing
administrative, social legislation (unconstitutional) through the
National Governors Association, Council of State Governments and the
United Nations; all run by the same faction of Khazarians! The
Khazarians/Ashkenazi/Zionists are in control of Israeli government,
international banking, and all the various national and world Jewish
Congresses and Committees. Just ask any _Sephardic_ Jew how much of a
role they play in governmental affairs. In Israel they are treated as
second-class citizens _by the Khazarian Ashkenazi Zionist Jews_!
A few personal notes here. Please don't misconstrue my
intentions with this article. I have no connection with any white
supremacist type organization or any such group of ignorant, foolish
racists and bigots. I am not implicating all, or even most, Jewish
people with this information. As a matter of fact, this information
is more for the millions of good and godly Jewish people in the world
than for anyone else. All Jewish people everywhere need to realize
_who stole the Judean's heritage and why_, because it is the true Jews
and the Godly Jews that have always been sacrificed at the alter of
the Khazarians. these few power-seeking bad apples spoil the whole
bunch and its time for the "true Jews" to see it and speak out. In
fact, many have. Such truthful men as the Jewish authors presented
above have tried to reveal the truth to people, as well as those such
as Rabbi Elmir Berger, Rabbi Louis Joel Teitelbaum and many other
Jewish scholars. Again _all_ the above information is from Jewish
historians and scholars.
In the above article we are talking about a _specific_ group of
evil men who are trying to control the world's wealth, minds and
ultimately, souls. The Khazarian/Ashkenazi/Zionist _elite_ leaders
are the anti-god/anti-Christ force of the world. The "adversary"
energy (by whatever name) must have physical beings to work through
and _they are it_. They are the destroyers and the testers of
humanity. They have done their job well, indeed. But the world they
have ensnared in their web of deceit and lies is now fully exposed.
They know the game is over, but will certainly fight to the very end.
So be it. Creator's troops of light and truth are here once again and
are now prevailing.
recall _Revelations_ 3:9; "To those who are of the synagogue of
Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not..."
METRO, IMF, WORLD BANK, CSG, BIS, IRS, U.N.,
FEDERAL RESERVE, GOVERNORS ASSOC., ONE WORLD ORDER
1: The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler
2: The Garden of Aton, by Nora Boyles
3: A History of Russia, by Nicholas Rissanovsky
4: Facts are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman
5: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty
Sept. 30, 1995
By Rex Weeks
Please keep in mind with this series of articles on Khazarian self-
chosen Jews that there is no intent whatsoever to insult or denigrate
all Jews worldwide. The fact is that we are talking about a small,
specific faction of world-domination thinking "Jews" who have stolen
the Hebrew Judaists heritage and use it for their own gain. I honor
all Jewish seekers of truth who see this light because you are the
most affected by this evil ploy.
In the last article on the history of the Khazars of southern Russia,
we learned that this powerful warrior/merchant/pagan tribe became
"Jews" (Judahites) as a political decision in 740 A.D., according to
the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. They had, and still have, no
connection at all to the Biblical Hebrew Judaists. They had build a
despotic empire by brutal warfare and in part through their extraction
of a 10 percent "toll" (tax) on all traders passing through their
lands, with the penalty of death for those who would resist.
Around 862 A.D., a _Rus_, (or "Varangian" of Nordic/Viking origin)
leader from the north and west named Rurik founded the city of
Novgorod, and _Russia_ was born. Some of these "Russians" settled in
areas of Khazar territory and warfare ensued.
In 989 A.D., Russia's leader, Vladimir of Kiev, embraced Christianity,
as did the populace. Russia became a Christian nation and was so
until the Bolshevik Revolution. Lets see how that came about.
Around 1016, the Russian forces defeated the Khazars, and their
kingdom was finished. Many Khazarians, who now called themselves
"Jews", stayed in their old homeland area of southern Russia, but
others "migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia" (Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, pg 377). Many moved to the areas now known as
eastern Europe (Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, Germany). In 1240 in
Kiev, "The Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members
finding refuge in towns further west" (Univ Jewish Encyl.Vol VI pg
382). With the third partition of Poland in 1793, Russia acquired the
world's largest 'Jewish' (Khazarian) population, which would
eventually contribute to their downfall.
Understand the situation here. You have a Khazarian people who are
now self-chosen 'Jews' (not Biblical Judaists) following the
_Babylonian Talmud_, who were just conquered by a Christian Russian
people. The Judaized Khazars held deep ideological resentment against
their new Christian rulers which set the stage for future war against
the Russians. The Khazarians 'Jews' were determined not to be
Russianized or Christianized.
Under Christian Tsarist Russia, most Jews (Khazarians) were relegated
to a specific area of southern/western Russia called the "Pale of
Settlement". In 1897, the year of Russia's first census, 93.6 percent
of Russian Khazarian 'Jews' lived in the 'Pale'. It was in the Pale
period when many Jewish/Khazarian radicals fomented the plot to
finally overthrow their age old enemy, the Christian Russians, through
their movements of Zionism and Bolshevism! Feeling a possible
kinship, many were also students of Karl Marx, the Jewish
author/revolutionary. Eventually, every Russian 'Jew'/Khazarian came
to identify themselves with one of the three movements above.
In the early 1800's, Alexander II attempted to have the Jew/Khazars
assimilate into the Russian community. They were now permitted into
the universities and to hold professional and governmental positions.
While this provided opportunity for the law-abiding Jewish citizen, it
also opened the "Pandora's Box" of Jewish/Khazarians anti-government
Tsar Alexander II lost considerable enthusiasm for the liberal
"Jewish" policy when an assassination attempt was made on his life in
1866. Another attempt was made again in 1879. Finally, in 1881, a
plot was hatched at the home of Hesia Helfman (Jewish/Khazar), and the
Tsar was killed.
Much unrest and rioting occurred thereafter. In 1882, the Russian
"May Laws" were passed in an attempt to stem the tide of both
Jewish/Khazarian exploitation of people and the anti-Jewish reaction
to this. Under Nicholas II there was no abatement of the regulations,
after the murder of Alexander II, to curb the anti-government
activities of the Jews; consequently, the "reaction to those excesses
was Jewish support of the Bolsheviks" (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,
Vol. I, pg. 286).
The Russian Empire was in social and economic turmoil. Desperate for
money, the Russian minister turned to the banking house of Rothchild
(Khazarian financier). Once the loans were made, Rothschild informed
them that unless the Jewish persecution stopped, no more money would
be forthcoming. This set the stage for even further unrest.
In 1900, the Jewish dominated Social Revolutionary Party was
responsible for the assassination of no less than six ranking members
of the Imperial government. It's chief was the Khazarian Jew,
Gershuni, along with Yevno Azev, son of a Jewish tailor.
"Bloody Sunday" marked the beginning of the 1905 Revolution. The
Jewish Khazarian Marxists were joined by the working class. This was
the real beginning of the Jewish dominated revolution in Russia. This
year also marked the return of Lenin from his Siberian exile.
Several political parties were formed in the subsequent years leading
up to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. There was the workers union, The
Jewish General Workers Union, or Bund, the Mensheviks, a predominantly
Jewish group, and the Bolsheviks. The leaders of these groups made up
the Petersburg _Soviet_, led by such Jews as Zborovski, Nosar and
Trotsky (real name Bronstein).
With the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the Khazarian Jewish/Marxists
of the Bolshevik/Communist Party had finally achieved the overthrow of
their Christian Russian rulers.
One of the first acts of the Provisional Government was to bring back
to Russia the political victims of the tsarist government who had
either fled or been exiled. Among the _ninety thousand_ exiles
(almost all professional revolutionaries) most were Jewish, with the
few exceptions. Returning to Russia were men such as Lenin (again),
Stalin, Kamenev, Martov, Radek (Sobelsohn, who was head of the Soviet
Russian Atheist Party), Sverdlov and others. These were _all_
Jewish/Khazarian radicals, including Lenin. The Petersburg Soviet was
initially Menshevik dominated but was soon taken over by the
Bolsheviks, who in 1918 changed their name to the _Communist Party_.
There power was consolidated by the merging of the Jewish Bund.
To see the Jewish/Khazarian influence in the Bolshevik takeover of
Russia, let's take a look at some statistics relating to the members
of the Communist organizations that formed the core of the Revolution.
Some of the following is from Robert Wilton, Russian correspondent of
_The Times_. The list of names of the Communist/Bolshevik/Khazarian
rulers of the Revolution are as follows:
The Central Committee of the Extraordinary Commission and
the Council of Commissars, of the 62 members; 5 Russians,
1 Ukrainian, 6 Letts, 2 Germans, 1 Czech, 2 Armenians,
3 Georgians, 1 Karaim (Jewish sect), 41 Jews.
The Extraordinary Commission of Moscow;
of 36 members; 1 German, 1 Pole, 1 Armenian, 2 Russians,
8 Letts, 23 Jews.
The Council of People's Commissars;
2 Armenians, 3 Russians, 17 Jews.
According to the _Soviet Press_, out of 556 important functionaries of
the _Bolshevik State_, including the above, there were in 1918-1919;
17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans,
1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Czech, 1 Karaim, and
The _Central Committee of the Bolshevik/Communist Party is as follows:
Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Loured (Larine),
Ourtitski, Volodarski, Rosenfeldt (Kamenev), Smidovitch,
Sverdlof (Yankel), Nakhamkes (Steklof), Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko,
Lounatcharski. All but the last two are Jews.
The Central Committee of the _Menshevils_; 11 members, all Jews.
Communists of the People, 6 members, 1 Russian, 5 Jews.
S.R. (Right Wing), 15 members, 2 Russians, 13 Jews.
S.R. (Left Wing), 12 members, 2 Russians, 10 Jews.
Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow, 5 members, 1 Russian, 4 Jews.
Polish Communist Party, 12 members, all Jews.
Here is another breakdown of the ruling Bolshevik/Communist/Khazarians
who ran the Revolution:
Name (Real Name) Nationality
Lenin Ulyanov Rus/Jewish
Trotsky Bronstein Jewish
Martoff Zederbaum Jewish
Zinoviev Apfelbaum Jewish
Steckloff Nakhames Jewish
Kamenov Rosenfeld(t) Jewish
Dan Gourevitch Jewish
Ganetzky Furstenberg Jewish
Parvus Helpfand Jewish
Uritzky Padonilsky Jewish
Larin Lurge Jewish
Bohrin Nathansohn Jewish
Martinoff Zibar Jewish
Bogdanoff Zilberstein Jewish
Garin Garfeld Jewish
Suchanoff Gimel Jewish
Kamnelff Goldman Jewish
Sagersky Krochmann Jewish
Riazanoff Goldenbach Jewish
Solutezeff Bleichmann Jewish
Piatnitzky Ziwin Jewish
Axelrod Orthodox Jewish
Glasnuoff Schultze Jewish
Zuriesain Weinstein Jewish
Lapinsky Loewensohn Jewish
After Reading the above, there can be no question at to the role of
the Khazarian Jewish Communists in the Bolshevik Revolution which
overthrew Christian Russia.
"Individual revolutionary leaders of Jewish origin - such as
Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamemev, and Sverdlov - played a conspicuous part
in the revolution of November, 1917. which enabled the Bolshevists to
take possession of the state apparatus" - Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia, Vol IX, pg. 668
The Jewish writer, M. Cohen in an article published in _The Communist_
(a Soviet paper), wrote: "The Great Russian revolution was indeed
accomplished by the hands of the Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks
of the red Army as far as _privates_ are concerned, but in the
Committees (Soviet), and the Soviet organization as Commissars, the
Jews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol of Jewry has become
the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen in the fact
of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former times was
the symbol of Zionism and Jewry."
The battle in Russia then, and _now_, is an age old conflict between
the Khazarian Communist Ashkenazi Bolshevik "Jew" and the Christian
Russia. The battle wages on today.
The ramifications of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia were dire.
Estimates are that anywhere from 30 to 80 million Christians (60
million according to Soltzchenytsin) were killed at the hands of the
atheistic Khazarian Communist Bolshevik "Jews". This included
millions of Jews themselves who were sacrificed at the Khazarian alter
of blood. This Christian Holocaust is one you never hear of and is
one of the most horrific in history. The Khazarians will not hesitate
to sacrifice even their "own" (or especially true Jews).
to understand the treason and treachery of the Khazarian Communist
Zionist, you need to see how they aided and abetted the Russian
Revolution (and Nazi Germany) through financial support.
During the Bolshevik Revolution, the Khazarian Jewish banker, Jacob
Schiff (who helped establish the Federal Reserve) helped to send
Trotsky to Russia with a support of $20 million dollars!
As evidence of Jacob Schiff's "settlement in Russia" effort, we have
the following letter from the _German Imperial Bank of Stockholm_;
"Dear Comrade; In conformity with a telegram from the Westphalian
Rhineland Syndicate, Max Warburg & Co.'s Bank informs you that an
account is opened to Comrade _Trotsky's_ enterprise. I. Furstenburg."
At the time, the Jewish bankers, the Warburgs (Max, Felix and Paul)
were co-directors with Jacob Schiff of the New York Banking House
of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. The _American Civil Servant Document_ 65th
Congress, 3rd Session, contains the following:
"It was found that the following persons, as well as the banking
house mentioned, were engaged in these work of destruction (meaning
the subsidizing of Russian revolutionaries); Jacob Schiff, Guggenheim,
Max Breitung, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer
Schiff, and S.J. Hanauer." (all Khazarians).
This was also evidenced in Nazi Germany where Khazarian Ashkenazi
(Jewish power brokers were involved in financial dealings with the
Germans. Rockefeller of Standard Oil (in conjunction with I.G.
Farben) supplied Germany before and during the war. I.G. Farben in
fact had plants ( 'buna' rubber) inside some of the concentration/
labor camps. I.G. Farben had over a half dozen Jews (Ashkenazi) on
At the Nuremburg Trials, evidence was given connecting the Warburg
banking house with Hitler. The following testimony was given by the
widow of General Ludendorff:
"As early as the summer of 1929, James P. Warburg had undertaken
and assignment from financial circles in America which desired to
exercise solitary influence on Germany in the unleashing of a national
revolution. Warburg's task was to find the suitable man in Germany
(Hitler), who subsequently received sums of money amounting to 27
million dollars up to January 30, 1933, and still another seven
million thereafter, enabling him to finance his movement."
The London Jewish Chronicle of Jan. 6, 1933 reported, "Over one-third
of the Jews in Russia have become officials."
The "Jewish" nature of the Bolshevik Revolution was not lost on some
international leaders. That the Revolution was plotted, organized,
financed and managed by "Jews" (Khazarians) was further revealed by
Winston Churchill in the following statement:
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation
of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian
Revolution by these international atheistic Jews. The Majority of the
leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and
driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. In the Soviet
institutions the prominence of Jews is even more astonishing..."
Churchill again, in the "_Sunday Herald_" of 8-2-20 wrote;
"I deal here with the schemes of the International Jew...This
movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-
Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun
(Hungary), Rosa Luxemberg (Germany), Emma Goldman (U.S.A.), this
world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization, and for the
re-construction of society on the basis of arrested development, of
envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily
Further confirmation is given by the "_The American Hebrew_" as
"The Bolshevist Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish
brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning whose goal is to
create a _new order_ in the world. What was performed in so excellent
a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish
dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same
Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the
This brief history of Russia should awaken people, most especially all
good Jews, to the danger of the Khazarian Communist Zionist "Jews" in
our midst. They are the "One World Order" right from the Crown of
England, the British Israeli Zionists/Committee of 300, international
bankers, "Metro/1313", Federal Reserve, U.N., 'state' of Israel, and
British Intelligence (CIA, ADL, MI-6, etc.) ALL interconnected and
_planned_ organizations, the common denominator being the _KHAZARIANS_
regardless of agency or country.
I state before the eyes of God that I have true love and respect for
the millions of good Jewish people of the world and for their
contributions to humanity. But I have no respect for the evil, anti-
Christ Khazarian Communist Zionist "false Jewish" elite who have
stolen the heritage of the true Jews and use it to foment the control
and destruction of our freedom; even our souls, should we allow it.
It is up to those good and Godly Jews to reveal this truth to the
world, and you will find the world will stand with you.
1: The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty.
2: Behind Communism, by Frank Britton.
3: Three Who Made a Revolution, by Bertram D. Wolfe.
4: Universal Jewish Dictionary
5: Universal Jewish Encyclopedias
A Jewish Defector Warns America:
Benjamin Freedman Speaks
by Benjamin H. Freedman
Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a
successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time
the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with
organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent
the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman
knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the
highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to
gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted
with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin
Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers
and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic
audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf
of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.
Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech
has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his
warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.
HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists
have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many
and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their
co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the
absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very
broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are
few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on
one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side
by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to
the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean.
Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with
one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time,
the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of
French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army
was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they
didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the
Italian army had collapsed.
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had
crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering
England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what
the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call
the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started."
England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously.
They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace
that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the
war and being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and --
I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the
documents to prove any statement that I make --they said: "Look here.
You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have
to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can
win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The
United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were
young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will
guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to
fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after
you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get
the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay
is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to
promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to
promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely
absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any
interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it
as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United
States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October
of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here
remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-
German, entered the war as Britain's ally.
I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because
the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews,
all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled
by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German
because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to
see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they
didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like
Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States
refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar.
They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are
tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into
Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick
the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting
Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time,
everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to
green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd
been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having
fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a
sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns.
They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies'
hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared
war on Germany.
The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to
Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're
getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President
Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United
States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no
more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead
of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to
be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were
suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world
could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the
United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into
World War I.
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and
they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have
something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your
bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't
know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So
they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a
letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world
at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the
United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that
you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I
don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the
war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When
the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace
Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought
to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when
they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these
nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory,
said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first
time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So
the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game!
That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the
first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the
terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the
Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews
had never been better off in any country in the world than they had
been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times
as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this
country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines,
the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.
Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had
the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the
biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No
question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical
situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet
Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well,
let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing."
And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the
Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about
our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which
man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat,
if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese
citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working
with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was
through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How
would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't
think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There
wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine
how we would feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so
nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in
Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all
went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated
very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no
reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-
called "Jewish commonwealth."
Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you
read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921,
1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled
with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany
is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was
brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States
into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the
Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better
than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling.
There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of
their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was
anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went
home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our
Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United
States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to
one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for
which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of
being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world
trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French
Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities,
dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political
entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon
and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50
years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was
rivalling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the
world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products.
What happened as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap
down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a
valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off
the map politically.
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew
was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown
University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State
Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department
document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to
Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political
prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they
were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because
the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in
Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and
ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over
Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a
group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact,
when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought
the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and
that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to
Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in
Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back
into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way
they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They
fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists
fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one
another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the
Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90
million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of
one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they
controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy
because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued
and bought up practically everything.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world
to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I
say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned
them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or
the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an
enemy and brought about our defeat.
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.
Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July
1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every
Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no
matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of
the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what
the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of
Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer,
who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the
whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer
to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio
broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are
going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide
boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are
dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two
thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only
be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany
could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to
starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the
population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was
printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-
defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National
Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where
everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down
by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world
declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you
couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the
words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth
Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of
crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted
if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they
were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth,
something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a
store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a
family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found
stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany."
Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20
years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's
been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw
Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs
saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time,
not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There
was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there
Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a
boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our
industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?"
They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on
stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to
a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve
Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to
dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a
young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and
shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough
with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows
and having street fights and so forth.
Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's
meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use
it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against
Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this
world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World
War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely
necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see
which one was going to survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans
had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there
is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it
Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm.
In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The
Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that
"Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as
we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come
soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84
billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against
40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in
their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of
megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of
TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million
tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs
that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God
knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into
a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place?
It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World
War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists
everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the
United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their
foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am
standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read
it, and it is known all over the world.
What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your
boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it
any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a
deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.
Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew
it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson
knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President
Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was
"confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the
head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into
President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become
the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the
Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as
close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was
just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as
a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we
all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what?
So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've
fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness
who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his
testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York
state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told
one lie, disregard his testimony.
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because
they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to
them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern
European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of
those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They
were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they
were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into
eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square
miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European
countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -
- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to
war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and
powerful they were.
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to
go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it
was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere
in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy
of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic
faith --either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as
Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling
out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And
that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools
of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened
up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews.
There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in
the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the
beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the
Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in
Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People
to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your
Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.
You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew,
and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just
the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call
them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million
Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since
then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious
belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from
Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese
decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics.
Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be
crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that
had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the
Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported
to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a
different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted
Christianity as a religious faith.
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were
a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.
Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the
matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic,
everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.
So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly
it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're
going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People
to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a
bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the
magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business,
and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians
on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising
that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard
it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd
start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all
the misery that has befallen the world. Do you know what Jews do on
the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one
of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk
into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you
recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three
times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter
into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge
that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and
void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the
pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect.
And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow,
or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited
on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.
How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their
loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are
going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same
Following is an article from the June 13, 1996 edition of The Wanderer
that cries for wide distribution.
"In Our Hands"
by Joseph Sobran
One isn't supposed to say this, but many people believe that Israel
now holds the White House, the Senate, and much of the American
media in its hands. This is what is known as an anti-Semitic
The odd thing is that it is held by many Israelis. In an essay
reprinted in the May 27th issue of The New York Times, Ari Shavit,
an Israeli columnist, reflected sorrowfully on the wanton Israeli
killing of more than 100 Lebanese civilians in April: "We killed them
out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude
that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American
media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our
In a single phrase -- "in our hands" -- Shavit has lighted up the
American political landscape like a flash of lightning.
Notice that Shavit assumes as an obvious fact what we Americans can
say publicly only at our own risk. It's surprising, and refreshing,
to find such candor in an American newspaper (though his essay was
reprinted from the Israeli paper Haaretz).
The prescribed cant on the subject holds that Israel is a "reliable
ally" of the United States, despite Israel's long record of
double-dealing against this country, ranging from the killing of
American sailors to constant espionage and technology theft. The
word "ally" implies that the relationship exists because it's in the
interests of this country, though Israel's lobby is clearly devoted
to the interests of Israel itself, and it's childish to suggest
You expect that from the Israeli lobby; lobbies are lobbies, after
all. But it's unnerving that the White House, the Senate, and much
of the American media should be "in our hands," as Shavit puts it.
Bill Clinton, a lover of peace since his college days, raised no
protest when the Israelis drove 400,000 innocent Lebanese out of
their homes in "retaliation" for rockets launched into Israel
(wounding one Israeli) by a faction over whom those 400,000 had no
Congress, of course, was supine as usual at this latest extravagance
of Israeli "defense." Congress too is "in our hands."
A recent article in The Washington Post likened the Israel lobby's
power to that of the gun and tobacco lobbies. But there is one
enormous difference. Newspapers like the Post aren't afraid to
criticize the gun and tobacco lobbies. They will say forthrightly
that those lobbies seek goals that are dangerous for this country.
They don't dare say as much of the Israeli lobby.
But much of the press and electronic media are "in our hands" in a
more active sense: They supply misleading pro-Israel propaganda in
the guise of news and commentary, constantly praising Israeli
"democracy" and ignoring Israel's mistreatment of its non-Jewish
minorities -- mistreatment which, if any government inflicted it on
a Jewish minority, would earn it the fierce opprobrium of our media.
No decent American would think of reducing American Jews to the status
of Palestinians in Israel. The idea is almost absurd. Yet Americans
are taxed to subsidize the oppression of Palestinians, on the flimsy
pretext that they are helping an "ally" in America's own
self-interest to be hated and despised by the whole Muslim world.
All this is interesting less for what it tells us about Israel than
for what it tells us about America. Frank discussion of Israel is
permitted in Israel, as Shavit's article illustrates. It's rarely
permitted here. Charges of anti-Semitism and a quiet but very
effective boycott will be the reward of any journalist who calls
attention to his own government's -- and his own profession's --
servitude to Israeli interests.
Very few in America are doing anything to change this sorry state of
affairs. Shavit wrote his article in the desperate hope of turning
back his countrymen and his government from a morally and
politically perilous course. At least he can hope. It's harder for
us, when our own government isn't in our hands.
"All truth passes through 3 stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
--- Arthur Schopenhauer
The Southwest Reporter
Special Edition Sept. 30, 1995
Why Chicago as the Center for Metro and the
New World Order Treasonists?
By David A. Newby & "Grandma"
As this mystery unravels we have found more that has been hidden from
us. A very dear friend and fellow researcher asked a relevant
question in reference to this Metro mess, "Why Chicago"? This is a
very pertinent question and what the attendant research revealed will
be just one more shock upon those already revealed.
Grandma and I have to do our work by phone and fax. We don't have the
luxury of having the same books to work from in most cases and this
slows down this process of divination of the mystery. She has copies
of the old Charter maps and through these maps we found that under the
original charters Chicago and Connecticut were outside the Virginia
and Massachusetts charters. What we discovered was that Connecticut
and Chicago fell under the Hudson's Bay Company Charter.
Quoting the 11th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1911:
"In the year 1670 Charles II granted a charter to Prince Rupert
and seventeen other noblemen and gentlemen, incorporation them
as the 'Governor and Company of Adventures of England trading
into Hudson's Bay,' securing to them the 'sole trade and
commerce of all those seas, straits, bays, rivers, lake, creeks
and streams in whatever latitude they shall be, that lie within
the entrance of the straits commonly called Hudson's Straits,
together with all lands and territories upon the countries,
coasts and islands of the seas, bays, &c., aforesaid, that are
not already actually possessed by or granted to any of our
subjects, or possessed by the subjects of any other Christian
prince or state."
With this broad grant of latitude of all the waterways it should be
pretty obvious that the Charter included all of the Great Lakes. But
aside from all of this granting of land by the King, the Charter was
also granted the whole right to travel for trade to and from the bays
and waterways whether by land or water. This clause of the Charter
has heavy relevance later in this article.
In 1842 a Convention was concluded with England establishing the
northern border of the United States at the 49th parallel. In
studying these treaties and the laws you must always look at the words
because they always have a relevance. Citing the Convention as to
boundaries, Suppression of the slave Trade, and Extradition of 1842
Article IV states:
"All grants of land heretofore made by either party, within the
limits of the territory which by this treaty falls within the
dominions of the other party, shall by held valid, ratified and
confirmed to the persons in possession under such grant..."
This section states that any property rights would be honored. In
1863 there was a "Treaty for Settlement of Claims with the Hudson Bay
Company, etc." Article I states in part:
"...it was stipulated and agreed that in the future appropriation
of the territory south of the 49th parallel of the north
latitude, as provided in the first article of the said treaty,
(1846) the possessory rights of the Hudson's Bay Company...should
The verbiage is identical to the 1846 treaty of the boundaries west of
the rockies and similar to the 1842 Convention. The relevance of all
of this in these two treaties is that Chicago was a fort or outpost of
the Hudson's Bay Company. By 1842, and most definitely by 1863
Chicago was a large city. It is a proper assumption that the
Hudson's Bay Company had substantial property interests and holdings
in the Chicago area and that is why these provisions in the treaties
Remember that the original charter gave the Hudson's Bay Company
control over all trade and travel to and from the "waters". Chicago
today is a free port under maritime. With control of the travel and
trade granted in the original charter, it most probably means that the
Hudson's Bay Company controlled all the railroads, ports and roads in
Chicago and probably does so to this day. The Hudson's Bay Company
was relinquished to the Crown in 1869. This means that Chicago, at
least in great part, is nothing but a British outpost on American soil
and there is your direct connection between Metro and the Crown!
That's "Why Chicago"!
When one is into researching this type of data you never know what
you may find. While digging through the books I found the
Proclamation of 1763 in the Documents of American History. Within
this Proclamation we see the King of England establishing four new
governments, one in Quebec, one in East Florida, one in West Florida
and one in Grenada.
All of this got us to thinking. Why is the King of England setting up
government in these obviously French and Spanish territories? We
discovered that France and Spain had fought a war against England and
concluded it with a treaty in Paris in February of 1763. The
Proclamation was issued on October 7th of that same year. We
determined that these aforementioned territories falling under British
control shows that they were "prizes of war" and taken under treaty.
The relevance of all of this comes to light when you look at the fact
that we supposedly bought the "Floridas" from Spain in 1819. How
could we buy the Floridas from Spain if Spain gave them to England as
The question led us to the Treaty of Friendship of 1795. Within the
treaties of Spain at that time the King of Spain was always referred
to as His Catholic Majesty. But within the document of 1795 we find a
reference to His Majesty, a distinct difference and not an oversight.
Establishing the Commission for negotiations it states:
"And if on any account it should be found necessary that the said
Commissioners and Surveyors should be accompanied by guards, they
shall be furnished in equal proportions by the commanding officer
of His Majesty's troops in the two Floridas..."
As it appears from the distinction between His Catholic Majesty and
His Majesty, there were British occupying forces in the Floridas.
Here is a plausible hypothetical scenario: The King of England took
over the territories of the Floridas. The King of Spain had subjects
in the cities of St. Augustine and Pensacola and elsewhere. the King
of England took over the land, but let the King of Spain retain rights
to the cities, i.e. the Spanish Territory of the 1819 sale. When the
United States bought the Spanish territories in the Floridas it only
bought the Spanish cities.
When you read the treaty of 1819 where the deal was made "His Majesty"
appears again. From the way the treaty reads, the King of Spain had
to petition "His Majesty's foreign minister" to get permission to make
the sale. The British control of the Floridas also helps explain why
Andrew Jackson "fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans"
during the war of 1812... the British had a vested land interest!
Grandma states that the British troops were probably expelled, if they
were not already gone, by the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. Even though
there was no physical occupation by the British, the Crown still
maintains the property rights to the Floridas. This could explain why
Dade County, Florida is where the Metro pilot program started. It
also explains why the British sided with the South during the Civil
War, they were part owners!
Another point that must be considered is that as well educated as the
generation of the Founders was, they must have known of the British
ownership of the Floridas. Something of that magnitude could not be
reasonably overlooked. This leads one to thing that there may
possibly have been some kind of deal cut between the United States
government and the Crown.
Not of us was ever taught the Proclamation of 1763 which brings this
all into question. I am of the firm conviction nowadays that anything
that is hidden in hidden for a reason.
We've proven, through treaties and charters that the Hudson's Bay
Company owned Chicago and the travel and tread thereto which includes
more than likely the Chicago Transit Authority, the Port Authority,
the municipal water works, power and telecommunications companies, and
Notice on the list of CSG Associates how many public utilities and
public transpiration companies are affiliated. The following will
establish the ADL aspect or the Khazarian connection. Citing from
EIR's book, Dope, Inc.:
"The probe turned up a 70-year legacy of intimate ADL ties with
Jewish gangsters, from Meyer Lansky and his 'Our Crowd' sponsor
Arnold Rothstein, to more contemporary Dope, Inc. figures such as
Max Fisher, Edgar Bronfman, Edmond Safra, Meshulam Riklis, and the
ADL's own national chairman, Kenneth Bialkin, the lawyer for the
Medellin Cartel's 'American Connection,' Robert Vesco. We also
discovered that much of the ADL's financial backing comes from
leading families of Anglo-American establishment, whose fortunes
trace back to the British banks and trading companies that ran the
opium clipper ships in and out of China in the last century."
Take note of the name Meyer Lansky who was the head of the Mafia
during the Kennedy administration. Lansky had definitive connections
in Miami which still serves as a major point of ingress to this
country for illegal drugs. Remember that Attorney General Janet Reno
comes from Miami, or Metro-Dade, and has been accused of covering up
all manner of corruption in the book Votescam and by other individuals
who worked in close association with her. It is very likely that she
was picked as USAG specifically because of her probably ties directly
The Khazarian Bronfman family owns the Seagrams empire which you will
note is a corporate associate of the CSG. The Anglo-American banking
interests include J.P. Morgan & Associates. Per the citing from Dope,
Inc. these selfsame organizations serve as contributors to the ADL.
The Great Chicago fire occurred 8 years after the 1863 Settlement of
Claims with the Hudson's Bay Company back to the Crown. One of the
prime methods of deleting land titles and records is by fire. You
will find great numbers of burned houses of records in Peru,
Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, and all across the South during the Civil
War in order to expunge deeds as well as the original 13th Amendment.
Franklin Roosevelt once said that in politics there are no
coincidences. It is too coincidental that two years after the Crown
took over the possessions of the Hudson's Bay Company the city of
Chicago burned to the ground. What an excellent way it would be to
destroy legitimate land titles and put a British beachhead in America.
Grolier's National Encyclopedia states:
"The Great Fire destroyed 2,024 acres at a cost of $178,000,000,
which did not destroy the hopes of Chicago...which was rebuilt in
That means about $1 million per acre! We've done some figuring on
just where that $178 million came from and this is what we came up
with. Of Course, this is speculation based on certain real factors.
In the series we did on Railroads and Corporations we discussed the
Gold Railroad bonds issued during the Grant administration that made
certain Congressmen a 500% profit, for which none were prosecuted.
These bonds totaled about $62 million. Consider that a life insurance
policy (Tontine) on someone was about $2,000 at that time, multiplied
by about 1,500 deaths and that equals $3 million. A rough estimate on
property loss runs about $100 million what with residential and
commercial property, railroads, grainaries and cattle yards. That
leaves over $11 million unaccounted for. We speculated that the banks
that burned called their loans in from the smaller banks which made up
the other $11 million which caused reverberations throughout the
nation causing the Bank Panic of 1873. To make more sense out of
Railroad bonds........................ $62 million
Property loss and death insurance.....$100 million
Bank loans called in...................$11 million
Which would leave $5 million to be balanced between the property
damage, loss of life and the bank note calls equaling the $178 million
required to rebuild. It is our contention that most of this money
came from the Insurance premiums and the Railroad Bonds in order to
build a new "capitol" city in America from which to launch the New
World Order through the Agent called Metro.
"In 1890, Lake Michigan and the Illinois Michigan canal received
Chicago's sewage...the Chicago River, when the canal was brought
in, reversed its course to flow into the Mississippi..."
- (Groliers - 1939)
With the Settlement of the Hudson's Bay Company of 1863 giving the
lawful possessors of land control of the lands adjoining the water;
with the burning of all titles and deeds to prove ownership being
burned in the fire; with the control of the courts, what a wonderful
opportunity it would be to expand those "holdings" of the Hudson's Bay
Company to encompass all of Chicago. Anyone who disputed the claims
probably lost in court as they could not produce their deeds or titles
due to the fire. do you see how neat it is? And on top of that it is
a possibility that the assets of the major people involved had been
spirited away and stored before "Mrs. O'leary's cow" started the fire.
Could the Great Chicago fire be nothing more than another insurance
scam and power play by the British to reclaim this nation for herself?
The record of provable deeds is so phenomenal as to numb the mind, so
we don't think this is beyond the realm of possibility. Especially
when they modus operandi is the same, only on a larger scale.
Throughout this series we have laid out substantial proof of our
assertions, which, upon investigation will prove out the charges
levied of sedition, fraud, theft and treason. The United States
government, in concert with the British/Zionist/Communist controlled
Metro organizations and it's Governors' Conference of the fifty State
Governors has worked continuously to destroy this nation.
Even if we are incorrect in our assessment and potential reasons for
the Great Fire of 1871, (and we don't think we are), there is still
more than enough evidence to convict these traitors in any court of
In 1908 the Council of Governors issued a Declaration to the Congress
in reference to Conservation. This 1908 Declaration reads very
similar to the RAMSAR, and Bio-diversity treaty currently put forth
through the U.S. Government and the U.N., who is intimately tied into
Metro. The year 2007 keeps coming up in matters before the Congress.
The year 2007 is 99 years from the 1908 Council of Governors
Declaration on Conservation. This Declaration calls for the "COMPLETE
CONTROL" of the waterways, streams, lakes and rivers of this nation as
well as for soil and forest conservation. Sounds just like the
enviromentalist's "green" agenda, doesn't it? It is my assertion that
that is exactly what it is.
It appears that anywhere between 20-40 years before these treaties,
declarations and laws are to take effect, by the 99 years rule under
the Law of Perpetuity, the Metro gang create groups to push for the
acceptance of the already decided change. That figures out to be 1-2
generations, plenty long enough to push their agenda through the
propaganda mills and educate the next generation into acceptance.
Look at how hard the agenda is working for the biodiversity acceptance
through the cartoons your children watch and the commercials being
aired on recycling. We are all being herded like cattle into the new
Metro-ized society of the New World Order of British-Israel.
We all know that the flooding of the Midwest in the last two to three
yours is unnatural. Is it possible that these floods are not
accidental? With the rerouting and reversing of the Chicago River and
it dumping into the Mississippi the backwash would not be evident at
the headwaters but would flood downstream. does the connection to the
Mississippi River now give the Crown/Hudson's Bay Company a broadened
area of operations? Who is buying up all that land that was flooded
out? Metro and associates, ADM? Always follow the money. Who
These articles are supposed to make you think and maybe do something
to save your country and yourself. Grandma, Rex and I can't do it all
for you. You have to help expose the lie, and many of you are.
In the last article we showed how the Federal Reserve came into being
in 1913, but forgot to mention that two other British controlled
organizations came into this country as well, the American Bar
Association was organized in 1913 and so was the ADL. Through the
research of the EIR group, Liberty Lobby and others it has been
revealed that the ADL is nothing but an extension of the British
Intelligence arm MI-6 and is a spying and propaganda organization here
to do nothing but to promote the agenda of British-Israel, or Zionism.
The Intimate ties are there between the Khazarian elite and the royal
heads of Europe and have been intertwined for centuries. This nation
has stood as a bar to worldwide feudalism for the last two centuries,
but the efforts by these same entities to destroy this nation and her
people have almost succeeded. Our own lack of attention, de-education
and laziness have allowed us to come to this. Some blame lies with
Metro et al., the rest lies with us.
Documents of American History - Commager
U.S. Treaties, Conventions, International Acts,
Protocols and Agreements.
Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Ed. 1911
Dope, Inc. EIR
Grolier's National Encyclopedia, 1939 Ed.
NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS:
The owners and users of this system are exercising First Amendment
Some material on this system is in preparation for public
dissemination and is "work product material" protected under The First
Amendment Privacy Protection Act of 1980 (USC 42, Section 2000aa).
Note that this is a civil statute. Violation of this statute by law
enforcement agents is very likely to result in a civil suit as
provided under Section 2000aa-6. Each and every person who has such
"work product material" stored on this system is entitled to recover
at least minimum damages of $1000 *plus all legal expenses.* Agents
in some states may not be protected from *personal* civil liability if
they violate this statute.
In addition, there is email, i.e., "stored electronic communications"
as defined by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) which
has been in storage less than 180 days on this system. Such stored
electronic communications are protected by the ECPA from seizure or
"preventing authorized access" without warrants specific to each
person's email. Seizing the computer where this BBS resides would
prevent such authorize access. There are civil actions which may be
taken against law enforcement agents under provisions of the Act. You
can find them in USC 18, Section 2704. On this system you can expect
up to 200 people to have stored email. Each of them is entitled to
collect a minimum of $1000 *plus all legal expenses* for violations of
Section 2700 and 2703.
While the agency you work for *might* pay your legal fees and
judgments against you, why take chances? If you feel the need to go
after email, or take actions which would deny email access to our
users (such as seizing our hardware), get appropriate warrants.
In addition, it is a violation of the Arizona Revised Statutes, to
gain access to this (or any) Computer Bulletin Board System, by
supplying false information to the Sysop, and you can be criminally
charged with wire fraud.
It is the policy of the sysop of this system to cooperate with law
enforcement agents--though we will not be involved in entrapments.
It is our utmost concern to protect the rights and privacies of all
of the Members of this BBS.
Please bring it to my attention if you discover illegal activities on